ArticleData in brief2021
PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging.
Article in Data in brief, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Image Quality in Pelvis Lymphoscintigraphy SPECT/CT Using Discovery NM/CT 670.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Multicenter quantitativeQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- A heterogeneous phantom study for investigating the stability of PET images radiomic features with varying reconstruction settings.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The data presented here provide information about the role of reconstruction parameters on Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image quantification. Multiple phantom measurements in four different Spheres to Background Ratio (SBR) were performed on Biograph 6 TruePoint TrueV PET/CT scanner. PET raw data were reconstructed with/without resolution recovery algorithm using six various iteration x subsets with five different Full-Width Half-Maximum (FWHM) values of Gaussian post-smoothing filter. The Recovery Coefficient (RC) of six spheres using three common Volume of Interest (VOI) methods (max, 3D-50% Isocontour, and peak) were calculated. Moreover, SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.