Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195273›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2021

A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of the Leading Pathogens Causing Neonatal Sepsis in Developing Countries.

Desalegne Amare Zelellw, Getenet Dessie, Endalkachew Worku Mengesha, Melashu Balew Shiferaw, Masresha Mela Merhaba, Solomon Emishaw

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Research Progress on perinatalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Desalegne Amare ZelellwDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-6984
Getenet DessieDeparement of Adult Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Endalkachew Worku MengeshaDepartment of Reproductive Health and Population Studies, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-5513
Melashu Balew ShiferawAmhara Public Health Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Masresha Mela MerhabaAmhara Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Solomon EmishawDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-971X
Bahir Dar University · ETAmhara Regional Health Bureau · ETEthiopian Public Health Institute · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is one of the major public health problems globally, particularly, in developing countries.

methodsWe strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines to report this systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Science Direct, and other search engines such as Google Scholar, Africa Journals Online, and Hinari were used to obtain studies related to the leading cause of pathogens for neonatal sepsis in developing countries. The search was done from October 1 to December 30, 2018, by considering both published and gray literature. Studies were evaluated based on the PRISMA guideline checklist by using their titles, abstracts, and full texts. Studies were extracted using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, and STATA software version 14 was used to analyze data. Heterogeneity between studies was checked based on Cochran's

resultsThe pooled prevalence of the leading cause of pathogens of neonatal sepsis in developing countries were

conclusionsThis study highlights that the more prevalent common isolated pathogens in developing countries were

Indexed as

Escherichia coliKlebsiellaStaphylococcusStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoagulaseDeveloping CountriesEscherichia coli InfectionsGeographyHumansInfant, NewbornKlebsiella InfectionsNeonatal SepsisRegression AnalysisStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoagulase

Identifiers

PMID34195273
PMCPMC8203353
OpenAlexW3172497022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.