Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195260›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2021

Autophagy in Gastric Mucosa: The Dual Role and Potential Therapeutic Target.

Sheng-Yu Lu, Song Guo, Shao-Bin Chai, Jia-Qi Yang, Yuan Yue, Hao Li, Pei-Ming Sun, Tao Zhang, Hong-Wei Sun, Jin-Lian Zhou and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Investigation of the Mechanism ofInternational journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. High-Salt Diet ExacerbatesJournal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Metabolites Profiling and Bioassays RevealAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng-Yu LuDepartment of General Surgery, The 306th Hospital of PLA-Peking University Teaching Hospital, Beijing 100101, China.
Song GuoDepartment of General Surgery, The 306th Hospital of PLA-Peking University Teaching Hospital, Beijing 100101, China.
Shao-Bin ChaiDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Jia-Qi YangDepartment of General Surgery, The 306th Hospital of PLA-Peking University Teaching Hospital, Beijing 100101, China.
Yuan YueDepartment of General Surgery, The 306th Hospital of PLA-Peking University Teaching Hospital, Beijing 100101, China.
Hao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Pei-Ming SunDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Hong-Wei SunDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Jin-Lian ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Jian-Wu YangDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
He-Ming YangDepartment of General Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China.
Zheng-Peng LiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1871-9657
Yan CuiDepartment of General Surgery, The 306th Hospital of PLA-Peking University Teaching Hospital, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6833-5611
Air Force General Hospital PLA · CNPeking University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of stomach diseases is very high, which has a significant impact on human health. Damaged gastric mucosa is more vulnerable to injury, leading to bleeding and perforation, which eventually aggravates the primary disease. Therefore, the protection of gastric mucosa is crucial. However, existing drugs that protect gastric mucosa can cause nonnegligible side effects, such as hepatic inflammation, nephritis, hypoacidity, impotence, osteoporotic bone fracture, and hypergastrinemia. Autophagy, as a major intracellular lysosome-dependent degradation process, plays a key role in maintaining intracellular homeostasis and resisting environmental pressure, which may be a potential therapeutic target for protecting gastric mucosa. Recent studies have demonstrated that autophagy played a dual role when gastric mucosa exposed to biological and chemical factors. More indepth studies are needed on the protective effect of autophagy in gastric mucosa. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms and the dual role of various biological and chemical factors regulating autophagy, such as

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBacterial ProteinsGastric MucosaHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHomeostasisHumansInflammationLysosomesMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProton Pump InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBacterial ProteinscagA protein, Helicobacter pyloriProton Pump InhibitorsReactive Oxygen SpeciesVacA protein, Helicobacter pylori

Identifiers

PMID34195260
PMCPMC8214476
OpenAlexW3184417164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.