Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195258›Full record

ReviewERJ open research2021

Endothelial dysfunction in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using different functional assessment methods.

Marieta P Theodorakopoulou, Maria Eleni Alexandrou, Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi, Georgia Pitsiou, Ioannis Stanopoulos, Theodoros Kontakiotis, Afroditi K Boutou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Specialized gas-exchange endothelium of the zebrafish gill.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marieta P TheodorakopoulouDept of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-9635
Maria Eleni AlexandrouDept of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitra Rafailia BakaloudiDept of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Georgia PitsiouDept of Respiratory Failure, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis StanopoulosDept of Respiratory Failure, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Theodoros KontakiotisDept of Respiratory Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Afroditi K BoutouDept of Respiratory Medicine, G. Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-2038
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRG. Papanikolaou General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in COPD. Endothelial dysfunction is suggested to be one of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using any available functional method to examine differences in endothelial function between patients with COPD and individuals without COPD (controls).

methodsLiterature search involved PubMed and Scopus databases. Eligible studies included adult patients and evaluated endothelial damage

resultsOf the 21 reports initially identified, 19 studies with a total of 968 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. A significantly impaired response in endothelium-dependent (weighted mean between-group difference (WMD) -2.59, 95% CI -3.75 to -1.42) and -independent vasodilation (WMD -3.13, 95% CI -5.18 to -1.09) was observed in patients with COPD compared to controls. When pooling all studies together, regardless of the technique used for assessment of vascular reactivity, pronounced endothelial dysfunction was observed in COPD compared to controls (standardised mean difference (SMD) -1.19, 95% CI -1.69 to -0.68). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference was larger when patients with COPD were compared with nonsmoking controls (SMD -1.75, 95% CI -2.58 to -0.92). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results.

conclusionsPatients with COPD have significantly impaired endothelial function compared to controls without COPD. Future studies should delineate the importance of endothelial dysfunction towards development of cardiovascular disease in COPD.

Identifiers

PMID34195258
PMCPMC8236757
OpenAlexW3153929696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.