ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2021
Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and age-stratified outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants and Toddlers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond the narrow passage: comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty in infants.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Da Vinci robotic assisted pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty in newborns under 3 months.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of the treatment effect of laparoscopic and robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants under 6 months.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- A combined approach of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and flexible endoscopy to treat concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction and calyceal stones in children: Technical considerations and review of the literature.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.