Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195078›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Fluorescein-Guided Panendoscopy for Head and Neck Cancer Using Handheld Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: A Pilot Study.

Andreas Dittberner, Rafat Ziadat, Franziska Hoffmann, David Pertzborn, Nikolaus Gassler, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Validity of tissue homogeneity in confocal laser endomicroscopy on the diagnosis of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas DittbernerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Rafat ZiadatDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Franziska HoffmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
David PertzbornDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Nikolaus GasslerSection of Pathology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhite-light endoscopy and microscopy combined with histological analysis is currently the mainstay for intraprocedural tissue diagnosis during panendoscopy for head and neck cancer. However, taking biopsies leads to selection bias,

methodsBetween July 2019 and January 2020, 13 patients (69% male, median age: 61 years) with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer (T3/T4: 46%) underwent fluorescein-guided panendoscopy. CLE was performed from both the tumor and margins followed by biopsies from the CLE spots. The biopsies were processed for histopathology. The CLE images were

resultsMedian additional time for CLE during surgery was 9 min. A total of 2,565 CLE images were taken (median CLE images: 178 per patient; 68 per biopsy; evaluable 87.5%). The concordance between histopathology and CLE images varied between the patients from 82.5 to 98.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to detect cancer using the classified CLE images was 87.5, 80.0, and 84.6%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 87.0 and 80.0%, respectively.

conclusionCLE with a rigid handheld probe is easy and intuitive to handle during panendoscopy. As next step, the high accuracy of

Indexed as

confocal endomicroscopyfluorescein sodiumfluorescence guided surgeryhead and neck surgerylaseroptical biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34195078
PMCPMC8236705
OpenAlexW3169243794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.