Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34194902›Full record

Review3 Biotech2021

The potential of nanomaterials associated with plant growth-promoting bacteria in agriculture.

Amanda Carolina Prado de Moraes, Lucas da Silva Ribeiro, Emerson Rodrigues de Camargo, Paulo Teixeira Lacava

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Elicitation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda Carolina Prado de MoraesLaboratory of Microbiology and Biomolecules, Department of Morphology and Pathology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, s/n, São Carlos, 13565-905 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-3338
Lucas da Silva RibeiroInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Electrochemistry and Ceramics, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, s/n, São Carlos, 13565-905 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6314-0076
Emerson Rodrigues de CamargoInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Electrochemistry and Ceramics, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, s/n, São Carlos, 13565-905 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-5353
Paulo Teixeira LacavaLaboratory of Microbiology and Biomolecules, Department of Morphology and Pathology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, s/n, São Carlos, 13565-905 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-606X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impacts of chemical fertilizers and pesticides have raised public concerns regarding the sustainability and security of food supplies, prompting the investigation of alternative methods that have combinations of both agricultural and environmental benefits, such as the use of biofertilizers involving microbes. These types of microbial inoculants are living microorganisms that colonize the soil or plant tissues when applied to the soil, seeds, or plant surfaces, facilitating plant nutrient acquisition. They can enhance plant growth by transforming nutrients into a form assimilable by plants and by acting as biological control agents, known as plant growth-promoting bacteria. The potential use of bacteria as biofertilizers in agriculture constitutes an economical and eco-friendly way to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. In this context, nanotechnology has emerged as a new source of quality enrichment for the agricultural sector. The use of nanoparticles can be an effective method to meet the challenges regarding the effectiveness of biofertilizers in natural environments. Given the novel sustainable strategies applied in agricultural systems, this review addresses the effects of nanoparticles on beneficial plant bacteria for promoting plant growth.

Indexed as

EndophytesNanobiofertilizerNanoparticlesPlant growthRhizobacteria

Identifiers

PMID34194902
PMCPMC8190246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.