ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2021
Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in the tumor-infiltrating immune cells of patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have investigated the prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive expression in the tumor cells (TC) of patients with lung cancer. However, tumor-infiltrating immune cell (TIIC)-based PD-L1 expression and its prognostic value remain controversial. The present meta-analysis was performed on 11 studies comprising 2,685 patients, which were identified by a systematic search on the PubMed, PMC, Web of Science and Embase databases. The databases were searched for published articles up to October 30, 2020. The studies that evaluated overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) in the PD-L1 TIIC of patients with lung cancer were analyzed. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 16.0. The results demonstrated that PD-L1 expression in TIICs was not associated with OS [HR=0.98; confidence interval (CI)=0.73-1.33; P=0.53] and DFS (HR=1.05; CI=0.63-1.77; P=0.42) for all the cohort included in the study. However, subgroup analysis revealed that PD-L1 TIICs were associated with improved OS in lung squamous cell carcinoma (HR=0.76; CI=0.58-0.99; P=0.04), while poorer DFS was observed in lung adenocarcinoma (HR=1.30; CI=1.19-1.43; P=0.008) and at the >1% staining cutoff value (HR=1.56; CI=1.12-2.16; P=0.03). However, poor OS (P=0.21) and DFS (P=0.14) were observed in Asian populations, while DFS (P=0.07) for only-membrane staining was not statistically significant. The results of the present study suggested that adding PD-L1 TIICs to the existing diagnostic algorithm may help to guide patient selection for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Future large-scale studies are warranted for confirmation of the present findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.