Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34194693›Full record

ArticleChemical science2021

DeepFrag: a deep convolutional neural network for fragment-based lead optimization.

Harrison Green, David R Koes, Jacob D Durrant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harrison GreenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15260 USA durrantj@pitt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-3906
David R KoesDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15260 USA.
Jacob D DurrantDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15260 USA durrantj@pitt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-4097

Funding

Methods, Tools and Resources for Interactive Online Virtual Screening and Lead OptimizationR01GM108340 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOES, DAVID RYAN · 2013 to 2020
$1.8M
Advancing drug-lead and chemical-probe discovery using weighted-ensemble simulations and biophysical validationR01GM132353 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DURRANT, JACOB D · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108340NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning has been increasingly applied to the field of computer-aided drug discovery in recent years, leading to notable advances in binding-affinity prediction, virtual screening, and QSAR. Surprisingly, it is less often applied to lead optimization, the process of identifying chemical fragments that might be added to a known ligand to improve its binding affinity. We here describe a deep convolutional neural network that predicts appropriate fragments given the structure of a receptor/ligand complex. In an independent benchmark of known ligands with missing (deleted) fragments, our DeepFrag model selected the known (correct) fragment from a set over 6500 about 58% of the time. Even when the known/correct fragment was not selected, the top fragment was often chemically similar and may well represent a valid substitution. We release our trained DeepFrag model and associated software under the terms of the Apache License, Version 2.0.

Identifiers

PMID34194693
PMCPMC8208308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.