ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2021
Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Total hip arthroplasty in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2024Pooled it
- The Impact of Preoperative Inflammatory Activity in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis on Postoperative Joint Function: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Activity Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Which Patients Are Active, and Is Being Active Safe?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Outcome scores after hip surgery in young adults: an editorial approach.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Treatment of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) are already proven good for end-stage arthritis in the older populations but it is challenging in young teenage patients. The primary aim was to assess Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOSS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and secondary aim for implant survival rate. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe details of 33 teenage patients (forty hips) who underwent HRA (21) and THA (19) at our institution (January 2002 to December 2013) with a mean follow-up period of 11.00 years (range 7.00-18.40) were included. The study group had 25 males and eight females.
resultsThe overall median HOOSs with interquartile range were 89.00 (87.63-0.00). The median HOOSs at follow-up were as follows: 95.00 (90.00-95.00) for symptoms, 92.00 (90.00-95.00) pain, 87.00 (85.00-90.00) for functions, 81.00 (75.00-85.00) for sports and 94.00 (88.00-95.00) for QOL. HHS improved significantly from 36.88 ± 6.14 to 90.12 ± 6.56 (
conclusionOur study showed a disability rate of zero with improved HOSS and HHS. The overall implant survival rate was good with 100% at 5 years, 97% at 10 years and 89.9% at 15 years in contrast to the previous studies with the use of modern implants and newer standard surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A Level II study http://www.spine.org/Documents/LevelsofEvidenceFinal.pdf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.