Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34194537›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Identification of Arrhythmia by Using a Decision Tree and Gated Network Fusion Model.

Peng Lu, Yabin Zhang, Bing Zhou, Hongpo Zhang, Liwei Chen, Yusong Lin, Xiaobo Mao, Yang Gao, Hao Xi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peng LuSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1125-9507
Yabin ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-1286
Bing ZhouSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-3903
Hongpo ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center of Internet Healthcare, Zhengzhou 450052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-8470
Liwei ChenDepartment of Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yusong LinSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Xiaobo MaoDepartment of Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yang GaoSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-4079
Hao XiSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-6873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning (DNN) based methods have made leapfrogging level breakthroughs in detecting cardiac arrhythmias as the cost effectiveness of arithmetic power, and data size has broken through the tipping point. However, the inability of these methods to provide a basis for modeling decisions limits clinicians' confidence on such methods. In this paper, a Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) and decision tree fusion model, referred to as (T-GRU), was designed to explore the problem of arrhythmia recognition and to improve the credibility of deep learning methods. The fusion model multipathway processing time-frequency domain featured the introduction of decision tree probability analysis of frequency domain features, the regularization of GRU model parameters and weight control to improve the decision tree model output weights. The MIT-BIH arrhythmia database was used for validation. Results showed that the low-frequency band features dominated the model prediction. The fusion model had an accuracy of 98.31%, sensitivity of 96.85%, specificity of 98.81%, and precision of 96.73%, indicating its high reliability and clinical significance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDecision TreesDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHumansModels, CardiovascularNeural Networks, ComputerWavelet AnalysisWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID34194537
PMCPMC8181111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.