Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34194270›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2021

Design and characterization of propolis extract loaded self-nano emulsifying drug delivery system as immunostimulant.

Annisa Fitria, Suci Hanifah, Lutfi Chabib, Adnan Muhammad Uno, Hodijatul Munawwarah, Nur Atsil, Hendry Aditya Pohara, Dwi Amalia Weuanggi, Yandi Syukri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Wound-Healing Effect of Nanoemulgel of Kangkung (Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annisa FitriaDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Suci HanifahDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Lutfi ChabibDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Adnan Muhammad UnoDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Hodijatul MunawwarahDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Nur AtsilDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Hendry Aditya PoharaDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Dwi Amalia WeuanggiDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Yandi SyukriDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Islamic University of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This current study aims to optimize, characterize, and observe the stability of the self-nano emulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) of propolis extract (PE) for improving the immune response. Optimization of the selected composition of SNEDDS was conducted using a D-optimal mixture design. SNEDDS was prepared by loading 150 mg/mL of PE in oil, surfactant, and cosurfactant phases. The thermodynamic stability test was carried out with phase separation parameters followed by the robustness to dilution and accelerated stability test. The immunostimulant activity was examined in vitro and in vivo by determining the phagocytic activity, cell proliferation, production of nitrite oxide levels of RAW 264.7 cells, phagocytic activity of macrophages, and the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes. The formula optimization showed that the formula containing Capryol-90, Cremophor RH40, and PEG 400 at a ratio of 30: 34: 36 was optimum. The verification response of the optimum formula with drug loading showed that the transmittance, droplet size, and zeta potential were 96.90 ± 0.00%, 28.7 ± 1.20 nm, and -56.5 ± 2.05 mV, respectively. The thermodynamic stability test and robustness to dilution did not find any separation phase. The accelerated stability test results were classified as stable. The in vitro and in vivo immunostimulant activity test showed that PE-loaded SNEDDS exhibited a higher immunostimulant effect than PE. In conclusion, the optimum and stable composition of PE loaded SNEDDS was found with a simple and accurate method using the D-Optimal mixture design and demonstrated an immunostimulant activity.

Indexed as

Capryol-90D-optimal mixture designImmunostimulantPropolis extractSNEDDS

Identifiers

PMID34194270
PMCPMC8233540
OpenAlexW3158723689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.