Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34194269›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2021

Causes of vancomycin dosing error; problem detection and practical solutions; a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study.

Abdullah M Alzahrani, Anjum Naeem, Ali F Alwadie, Khalid Albogami, Rami M Alzhrani, Samah S Basudan, Yahya A Alzahrani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Abdullah M AlzahraniKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Anjum NaeemKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali F AlwadieKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AlbogamiKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rami M AlzhraniDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Samah S BasudanDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yahya A AlzahraniKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAMinistry of Health · SATaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycindosing error and inappropriate monitoring is a common problem in hospital daily practice. In King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Jeddah, a high percentage of abnormal vancomycin trough levels is still detected despite using the recommended dose. Therefore, the current research objective is to study the major causes of vancomycin dosing errors. This retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study was carried out at KAMC hospital in Jeddah from January 1st until December 31st 2019. All adult patients (≥15 years) who received vancomycin and had an initial abnormal trough level at the measured steady-state were included in this study. 472 patients have met the study inclusion criteria. The current study evaluated the factors that play a role in causing vancomycin trough level abnormalities such as sampling time, vancomycin dosing, and patient's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations. In this study, we found that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability was attributed to 65% of vancomycin's abnormal trough level. Also, the result showed a significantly increased odds of the low trough in the non-elderly group (OR 6, 95% CI 2.48 - 14.9, P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenic patients (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.119 - 4.365, P < 0.05). However, the odds of high trough levels were significantly elevated among patients who have CrCl < 50 ml/min (OR 5, 95% CI 1.262-20.539, P < 0.05). In addition, the present investigation revealed that the occurrence of abnormal vancomycin levels was not affected by daily duty time or working days (p > 0.05). The current study indicated that vancomycin dosing errors were common in KAMC patients; thus, there is an unmet need to evaluate the causes of vancomycin abnormal trough level and optimize a strategy that would enhance the therapeutic effectiveness and minimize the potential toxicity.

Indexed as

Abnormal TroughDuty timeNumber of interventionsSampling timeVancomycinWeekend's effect

Identifiers

PMID34194269
PMCPMC8233537
OpenAlexW3159184191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.