ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2021
The trends of dental biomaterials research and future directions: A mapping review.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of the Properties of an Experimental Dental Composite with Addition of Hydroxyapatite with Varied Micro and Nano Particle Size: An Evaluation of Mechanical Properties, Ion Release, and Surface Characteristics.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- SLA-printed nanographite-reinforced UV-curable resin composites for dental applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of S-PRG-based restorative and adhesive systems on biofilm formation and enamel demineralization in a simulated oral environment.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Intratubular Penetration Ability of Two Retrograde Obturation Techniques in Micro-Endodontic Surgical Procedure: An In Vitro Study with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- In Vitro Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Nanosized Hydroxyapatite and Fluorapatite on Cell Lines and Their Relevance to the Alveolar Augmentation Process.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Endodontic bioceramics: current and futurity aspects.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- Streptococcus-mutans and Porphyromonas-gingivalis adhesion to glazed/polished surfaces of CAD/CAM restorations.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Luting Cement to Zirconia Ceramics after Different Surface Treatments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bioactive Restorative Materials Applied over Coronal Dentine-A Bibliometric and Critical Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In Vitro Optical and Physical Stability of Resin Composite Materials with Different Filler Characteristics.Polymers · 2023Article
- Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sol-gel synthesis of lithium doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles and tricalcium silicate for restorative dentistry: Comparative investigation of physico-chemical structure, antibacterial susceptibility and biocompatibility.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Morphological Interface Between Restorative and Pulp-Capping Materials: A Systematic Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2023Review
- Aspects and Principles of Material Connections in Restorative Dentistry-A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Dental Applications: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Fast self-curing α-tricalcium phosphate/β-dicalcium silicate composites beneficial for root canal sealing treatment.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Cenospheres-Reinforced PA-12 Composite: Preparation, Physicochemical Properties, and Soaking Tests.Polymers · 2022Article
- The First Step in Standardizing an Artificial Aging Protocol for Dental Composites-Evaluation of Basic Protocols.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis literature research aimed to compare, contrast and quantify the innovations in the most commonly used dental biomaterials. METHODOLOGY: Original research articles based on experimental dental biomaterials published between 2007 and 2019 were retrieved and reviewed. A search of electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science indexed dental/biomaterials journals, has been conducted. The inclusion criteria in this research were: synthesis of experimental dental materials, whereas commercial dental materials, review articles, and clinical trials (case reports) were excluded.
resultsIt was found that the amount of publications related to dental subgingival implants, computer-aided modeling ceramics, aesthetic restorative materials, adhesives cements, ceramics, bioceramics, endodontic materials, bioactive scaffolds, stem cells, and guided-tissue membranes had increased significantly from 2007. At the same time, the number of publications related to dental cements, silver amalgam, and dental alloys has decreased. For characterization of dental materials it was noted that mechanical properties were tested mostly for restorative materials. On the other hand, biological properties were most assessed for dental subgingival implants and endodontic materials, however, physical properties predominantly for bioceramics.
conclusionIt is concluded that to meet clinical demands there was more focus on restorative materials that provided better aesthetics, including resin composites, adhesive resin composites (luting cements), zirconia, and other ceramics. The boost in laboratory and animal research related to bioceramics was attributed to their regenerative potential. This current literature study will help growing researchers to consider and judge the direction to which research might be guided in order to plan prospective research projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.