Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34194113›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2021

Optimization of processing conditions for development of chicken meat incorporated whole wheat bread.

Pramila Umaraw, G Chauhan, S K Mendiratta, Akhilesh K Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Purified protein glutaminase fromFood chemistry: X · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pramila UmarawDivision of Livestock Products Technology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243122 India.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-824X
G ChauhanDivision of Livestock Products Technology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243122 India.
S K MendirattaDivision of Livestock Products Technology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243122 India.
Akhilesh K VermaDepartment of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250110 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Present study was conducted to explore the incorporation of high level of chicken meat powder for developing protein enriched whole wheat bread. The aim was to optimise meat level and processing conditions for development of chicken meat bread. Box-Beheken design of response surface methodology was used for optimising the processing conditions of chicken meat incorporated whole wheat bread as processing conditions strongly influence the product characteristics. Meat level (30-35%), proofing time (60-120 min) and cooking time (10-12 min) were contemplated as constrains or variable factors for their effect on responses such as baking yield, moisture, protein, fat, ash, redness and yellowness value, flavour, porosity and overall acceptability which are essential for product acceptability and marketability, while the cooking temperature was kept constant at 220 °C. The responses were assessed by evaluating the physicochemical, proximate, colour units and sensory evaluation. A high coefficient of regression > 0.90 was obtained for all the responses indicating the fit of model. The desirability achieved for these responses was 0.841 for 31.497% meat level with proofing time 107.17 min and baking time of 12.74 min. The study concluded with development of chicken meat bread having high protein content with optimised processing conditions of proofing and cooking time.

Indexed as

ColourDesirabilityMeat breadOptimizationRSMSensory

Identifiers

PMID34194113
PMCPMC8196115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.