ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2021
A Novel Approach to Identifying How Equipment Disrupts the Airflow Patterns in the Operating Room.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A decrease in the infection rates in the operating room (OR) is attributable to advances in sterile technique; heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) filtration; and limiting the number of people entering and leaving the OR. However, some infection complications after open heart procedures have been linked to the discharge fans of surgical equipment, most notably from the LivaNova 3T. We believe that surgical infection within the OR may also be due to other devices with internal fans. The purpose of this study was to 1) identify surgical equipment with an internal fan and see how they affect the airflow in an OR, 2) use the equipment to positively affect airflow to possibly reduce the risk of surgical site infections, and 3) bring attention to the HVAC system ability to exchange air throughout the OR. By using a fog machine and multiple camera angles, we identified the devices that have an effect on the airflow. We saw that the direction of the intake vent of specific devices can change the direction of airflow and possibly help to remove air. Last, we showed how the current HVAC air exchange rate might not be enough to remove contaminated air within the OR. Understanding intake and discharge vents for all equipment is important because sterile contamination and wound infection may be minimized or mitigated completely by simply repositioning a few devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.