ArticleNature2021
Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical-Network Lesion-Symptom Mapping.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Quantifying the prevalence and impact of overreaching causal claims in social science.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Human Values Across the Lifespan: Age-Graded Differences at Three Hierarchical Levels and What We Can Learn From Them.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2026Article
- Structured Inequality, Uncertain Lifespans: Demographic Perspectives on Predicting Individual-Level Longevity.Population and development review · 2026Article
- An investigation into in-sample and out-of-sample model selection for nonstationary autoregressive models.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026Article
- Deep active learning and knowledge transfer for rapid discovery of lithium metal battery electrolytes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The marginal majority effect: When social influence produces lock-in.Science advances · 2026Article
- Multivariable machine learning prediction of risky alcohol use in contemporary youth.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Article
- Disentangling the configurational drivers of nursing science popularization: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis using WeChat data.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Climate variation and serotype competition drive dengue outbreak dynamics in Singapore.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Data-driven equation discovery reveals nonlinear reinforcement learning in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- A software ecosystem for brain tractometry processing, analysis, and insight.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Leveraging AI-Driven Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Early Detection and Social Function Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Large language models predict cognition and education close to or better than genomics or expert assessment.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Cross-validation and predictive metrics in psychological research: Do not leave out the leave-one-out.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Early identification of dropouts during the special forces selection program.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities for digital twins in precision medicine from a complex systems perspective.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- An Embedding-Based Semantic Analysis Approach: A Preliminary Study on Redundancy Detection in Psychological Concepts Operationalized by Scales.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions-the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes-and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34194044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.