Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193961›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Treatment of mixed depression with theta-burst stimulation (TBS): results from a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Diego Freitas Tavares, Paulo Suen, Carla Garcia Rodrigues Dos Santos, Doris Hupfeld Moreno, Leandro Da Costa Lane Valiengo, Izio Klein, Lucas Borrione, Pamela Marques Forte, André R Brunoni, Ricardo Alberto Moreno

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04123301 naunknown statusnot on this map

Theta-Burst Stimulation (TBS) in Major Depressive Episodes With Mixed Characteristics in Bipolar and Major Depressive Disorder: a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Clinical Trial of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2019 to 2021Enrolled90ConditionsDepressive Episode, Depressive Disorder, Bipolar DisorderArmsActive Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), Sham Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS)
NCT05388539 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

TBS Treatment for Treatment-Resistant Depression: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2022 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, Unipolar DepressionArmsTheta Burst Stimulation, Sham Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diego Freitas TavaresService of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo SuenFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Carla Garcia Rodrigues Dos SantosMood Disorders Unit, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Doris Hupfeld MorenoMood Disorders Unit, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Da Costa Lane ValiengoService of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Izio KleinService of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-9689
Lucas BorrioneService of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7367-2882
Pamela Marques ForteMood Disorders Unit, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
André R BrunoniService of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. brunoni@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-3571
Ricardo Alberto MorenoMood Disorders Unit, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-3442
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (University of Sao Paulo, School of Medicine) 2017/19237-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed depression is probably different in terms of clinical course and response to treatment. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is well established in non-mixed depression, and theta-burst stimulation (TBS) protocol is replacing conventional protocols because of noninferiority and reduced delivery time. However, TBS has not been adequately studied in mixed states. This study was a double-blind, six-week, sham-controlled, and randomized clinical trial of bilateral TBS targeting the right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, respectively. Adults with bipolar and major depressive disorder experiencing an acute mixed depression were eligible if they had not benefited from a first- or second-line treatment for acute unipolar or bipolar depression recommended by the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments. Out of 100 patients included, 90 composed modified intention-to-treat sample, which was patients that completed at least one week of the intervention. There were no significant differences in Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale score changes (least squares mean difference between groups at week 3, -0.06 [95% CI, - 3.39 to 3.51; P = 0.97] in favor of sham TBS). Response and remission rates per MADRS were also not statistically different among active and sham groups (35.7% vs. 43.7%, and 28.5% vs. 37.5% respectively at week 6, ps > 0.51). No other analyses from baseline to weeks 3 or 6 revealed significant time x group interaction or mean differences among groups in the mITT sample. Bilateral TBS targeting the DLPFC is not efficacious as an add-on treatment of acute bipolar and unipolar mixed depression. ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT04123301.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultCanadaDepressionHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34193961
PMCPMC8580982
OpenAlexW3173196443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.