Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193919›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Contrasting alien effects on native diversity along biotic and abiotic gradients in an arid protected area.

Reham F El-Barougy, Ibrahim A Elgamal, Abdel-Hamid A Khedr, Louis-Félix Bersier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Reham F El-BarougyDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta, Egypt. reham.elbarougy@unifr.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-1706
Ibrahim A ElgamalNature Conservation Sector, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, Cairo, 11728, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-2809
Abdel-Hamid A KhedrDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2270-8945
Louis-Félix BersierDepartment of Biology, Ecology and Evolution unit, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-8032
Damietta University · EGEgyptian Ministry of Environment · EGUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alien impact on native diversity could be a function of both the relatedness of alien species to native community and resources availability. Here, we investigated whether alien plants expand or decrease the functional and phylogenetic space of native plant communities, and how this is affected by alien relatedness to natives and by resources availability. We used a trait-environment dataset of 33 alien and 130 native plants in 83 pairs of invaded and non-invaded plots, covering a gradient of soil resources (organic matter-nitrogen) in Saint-Katherine-Protectorate, Egypt. First, we compared the changes in native composition and calculated alien relatedness to natives within each pair of plots. Second, we tested the effects of resources availability and relatedness on the magnitude of alien impact (defined as a change in native diversity). We found that native composition was phylogenetically less but functionally more diverse in invaded plots compared to non-invaded ones. Moreover, in resources-rich plots, dissimilar aliens to natives significantly increased native diversity, while in resource-limited ones, similar aliens to natives declined native diversity. These results suggest that the assessment of alien impacts in arid-regions is significantly linked to resources-availability and relatedness to natives. Hence, future studies should test the generality of our findings in different environments.

Identifiers

PMID34193919
PMCPMC8245551
OpenAlexW3176570455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.