Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193636›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2021

Effectiveness of virtual reality immersion on procedure-related pain and anxiety in outpatient pain clinic: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

Young Joo, Eun-Kyung Kim, Hyun-Gul Song, Haesun Jung, Hanssl Park, Jee Youn Moon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital therapeutics in pain medicine.The Korean journal of pain · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Young JooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-9486
Eun-Kyung KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-0366
Hyun-Gul SongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-0818
Haesun JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-6930
Hanssl ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-0373
Jee Youn MoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-7750
Seoul National University Hospital · KRCHA University · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study investigated virtual reality (VR) immersion in alleviating procedure-related pain in patients with chronic pain undergoing fluoroscopy-guided minimally-invasive intervention in a prone position at an outpatient clinic.

methodsIn this prospective randomized controlled study, 38 patients undergoing lumbar sympathetic ganglion block were randomized into either the VR or the control group. In the VR group, procedure-related pain was controlled via infiltration of local anesthetics while watching a 30-minute VR hypnotic program. In the control group, the skin infiltration alone was used, with the VR device switched off. The primary endpoint was an 11-point score on the numerical rating scale, indicating procedure-related pain. Patients' satisfaction with pain control, anxiety levels, the need for additional local anesthetics during the procedure, hemodynamic stability, and any adverse events were assessed.

resultsProcedure-related pain was significantly lower in the VR group (3.7 ± 1.4) than in the control group (5.5 ± 1.7;

conclusionsVR immersion can be safely used as a novel adjunct to reduce procedural pain and anxiety during fluoroscopic pain intervention.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAnxietyAutonomic Nerve BlockChronic PainGangliaHypnotics and SedativesMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPainPain PerceptionProceduralSympatheticVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure Therapy.

Identifiers

PMID34193636
PMCPMC8255151
OpenAlexW3175754490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.