ReviewRMD open2021
Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fracture.
Review in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of the Chinese herbal medicine Jintiange capsules in the postoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Cement leakage and post-operative outcomes after lower-versus higher-volume bone cement injection in percutaneous vertebroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Article
- Sequential anti-osteoporotic therapy with teriparatide and alendronate optimizes outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty in acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a 12-month prospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Observational
- Infection ofRadiology case reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Prediction of Subsequent Vertebral Fracture After Acute Osteoporotic Fractures from Clinical and Paraspinal Muscle Features.Calcified tissue international · 2024Article
- Stem Cell and Regenerative Therapies for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Implementation of a Specific Set of Intraoperative C-Arm Fluoroscopy Terminologies in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Recent trends in chronic pain medicine.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Advances in materials used for minimally invasive treatment of vertebral compression fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Study on the influence of balloon dilation mode on the intravertebral cleft of osteoporotic fracture.BMC surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appropriate care of patients with a recent painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) requires immobilisation, analgesics and spinal orthoses. Some VFs are however responsible for disabling pain and prolonged bed rest. In this context, vertebroplasty techniques have been proposed with a large benefit in case series and open-label randomised studies, but lack efficacy in three among four double-blind randomised studies. The objectives of the treatment of a recent painful VF are to relieve pain and to preserve mechanical conditions. With this in mind, we report an experts' opinion paper on the indications for vertebroplasty and research agenda for clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.