Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193503›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

PEP-CoV protocol: a PEP flute-self-care randomised controlled trial to prevent respiratory deterioration and hospitalisation in early COVID-19.

Annette Mollerup, Sofus Christian Larsen, Anita Selmer Bennetzen, Marius Henriksen, Mette Kildevaeld Simonsen, Nina Weis, Linette Marie Kofod, Berit Lilienthal Heitmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04530435 (PEP Flute-selfcare to Prevent Respiratory Deterioration and Hospitalization Among COVID-19 Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04530435 nacompletednot on this map

PEP Flute-selfcare to Prevent Respiratory Deterioration and Hospitalization Among COVID-19 Patients: a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBispebjerg HospitalRan2020 to 2021Enrolled378ConditionsCOVID-19, SARS-CoV-2ArmsPEP flute
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Annette MollerupResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark annette.mollerup@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8161-2214
Sofus Christian LarsenResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Anita Selmer BennetzenResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Marius HenriksenThe Parker Institute, Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Mette Kildevaeld SimonsenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina WeisDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3133-2724
Linette Marie KofodDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy and PMR-C, Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Berit Lilienthal HeitmannResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-4504
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfection with SARS-CoV-2 may progress to severe pulmonary disease, COVID-19. Currently, patients admitted to hospital because of COVID-19 have better prognosis than during the first period of the pandemic due to improved treatment. However, the overall societal susceptibility of being infected makes it pivotal to prevent severe courses of disease to avoid high mortality rates and collapse of the healthcare systems. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) self-care is used in chronic pulmonary disease and has been shown to prevent pneumonia in a high-risk cohort of patients with leukaemia. PEP flute self-care to prevent respiratory deterioration and hospitalisation in early COVID-19: a randomised trial (The PEP-CoV trial) examines the effectiveness on respiratory symptoms and need of hospital admission by regular PEP flute use among non-hospitalised individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised controlled trial, we hypothesise that daily PEP flute usage as add-on to usual care is superior to usual care as regards symptom severity measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) at 30-day follow-up (primary outcome) and hospital admission through register data (secondary outcome). We expect to recruit 400 individuals for the trial. Participants in the intervention group receive a kit of 2 PEP flutes and adequate resistances and access to instruction videos. A telephone hotline offers possible contact to a nurse. The eight-item CAT score measures cough, phlegm, chest tightness, dyspnoea, activities of daily living at home, feeling safe at home despite symptoms, sleep quality and vigour. The CAT score is measured daily in both intervention and control arms by surveys prompted through text messages. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was registered prospectively at www.clinicaltrials.gov on 27 August 2020 (NCT04530435). Ethical approval was granted by the local health research ethics committee (Journal number: H-20035929) on 23 July 2020. Enrolment of participants began on 6 October 2020. Results will be published in scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04530435; Pre-results.

Indexed as

COVID-19Activities of Daily LivingHospitalizationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Self CareTreatment Outcomeclinical trialsCOVID-19infectious diseasespreventive medicinepublic healthrespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)

Identifiers

PMID34193503
PMCPMC8249175
OpenAlexW3173831704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.