Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193501›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Coronavax: preparing community and government for COVID-19 vaccination: a research protocol for a mixed methods social research project.

Katie Attwell, Samantha Carlson, Jordan Tchilingirian, Tauel Harper, Lara McKenzie, Leah Roberts, Marco Rizzi, Darren Westphal, Paul Effler, Catherine Hughes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 'Corona is coming': COVID-19 vaccination perspectives and experiences amongst Culturally and Linguistically Diverse West Australians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katie AttwellSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia katie.attwell@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-2160
Samantha CarlsonSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jordan TchilingirianSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9509-3638
Tauel HarperFaculty of Arts, Business, Law and Education, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Lara McKenzieSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Leah RobertsSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Marco RizziSchool of Law, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-9655
Darren WestphalCommunicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Paul EfflerCommunicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Catherine HughesImmunisation Foundation of Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Valerie SwiftWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Christopher C BlythWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAhead of the implementation of a COVID-19 vaccination programme, the interdisciplinary Coronavax research team developed a multicomponent mixed methods project to support successful roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccine in Western Australia. This project seeks to analyse community attitudes about COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine access and information needs. We also study how government incorporates research findings into the vaccination programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Coronavax protocol employs an analytical social media study, and a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with purposively selected community groups. Participant groups currently include healthcare workers, aged care workers, first responders, adults aged 65+ years, adults aged 30-64 years, young adults aged 18-29 years, education workers, parents/guardians of infants and young children (<5 years), parents/guardians of children aged 5-18 years with comorbidities and parents/guardians who are hesitant about routine childhood vaccines. The project also includes two studies that track how Australian state and Commonwealth (federal) governments use the study findings. These are functional dialogues (translation and discussion exercises that are recorded and analysed) and evidence mapping of networks within government (which track how study findings are used). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and the University of Western Australia HREC. Study findings will be disseminated by a series of journal articles, reports to funders and stakeholders, and invited and peer-reviewed presentations.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolGovernmentHumansInfantSARS-CoV-2VaccinationWestern AustraliaYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19health policyinfection controlpublic health

Identifiers

PMID34193501
PMCPMC8249174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.