Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193498›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Comparison of treatment efficacy between 100% platelet-rich plasma and 100% serum eye drops in moderate-to-severe dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Passara Jongkhajornpong, Pawin Numthavaj, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Gareth McKay, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04683796 (Comparison of Treatment Efficacy Between 100% Platelet-rich Plasma and 100% Serum Eye Drops in Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04683796 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Treatment Efficacy Between 100% Platelet-rich Plasma and 100% Serum Eye Drops in Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled96ConditionsDry Eye DiseaseArms100% Autologous platelet rich plasma, 100% Autologous serum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Passara JongkhajornpongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8203-2353
Pawin NumthavajDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Thunyarat.ano@mahidol.ac.th pawin.num@mahidol.edu.
Thunyarat AnothaisintaweeDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Thunyarat.ano@mahidol.ac.th pawin.num@mahidol.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-8536
Kaevalin LekhanontDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gareth McKayCentre for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8197-6280
John AttiaCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9800-1308
Ammarin ThakkinstianDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THHunter Medical Research Institute · AUQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDry eye disease (DED) is a common eye problem. Although the disease is not fatal, it substantially reduces quality of life and creates a high economic burden, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe DED. Several biological tear substitutes (eg, autologous serum (AS), autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous platelet lysate) could effectively improve dry eyes. However, evidence on their comparative efficacy is controversial. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 100% APRP with 100% AS eye drops in patients with moderate-to-severe DED. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a single-centre, double-blinded randomised, parallel, non-inferiority trial. One hundred and thirty patients with moderate-to-severe DED, aged 18-70 years will be recruited from outpatient clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok from February 2021 to January 2023. Patients will be randomised to receive either 100% APRP or 100% AS eye drops (1:1 ratio) for 4 weeks. The primary outcomes are ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and ocular surface staining (OSS) evaluated using the Oxford scale. Secondary outcomes are fluorescein break-up time, Schirmer's I test, meibomian gland parameters and adverse events. Other measured outcomes include best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and compliance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol and any supplements used in conducting this trial have been approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University (MURA2020/1930). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients before study entry. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04683796.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesPlatelet-Rich PlasmaEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansLubricant Eye DropsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTearsThailandTreatment OutcomeLubricant Eye Dropsadverse eventscorneal and external diseasesstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34193498
PMCPMC8246355
OpenAlexW3176730928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.