Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193488›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Changing the narrative around obesity in the UK: a survey of people with obesity and healthcare professionals from the ACTION-IO study.

Carly A Hughes, Amy L Ahern, Harsha Kasetty, Barbara M McGowan, Helen M Parretti, Ann Vincent, Jason C G Halford

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03584191 (Awareness, Care & Treatment In Obesity Management - An International Observation), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03584191 completednot on this map

Awareness, Care & Treatment In Obesity Management - An International Observation (ACTION-IO)

TypeobservationalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2018 to 2018Enrolled17,287ConditionsObesityArmsNo treatment given
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Non-pharmacologicaL InterVEntions for Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain (RESOLVE) in People Living With Severe Mental Illness: A Realist Synthesis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carly A HughesFakenham Weight Management Service, Fakenham Medical Practice, Fakenham, UK carly.hughes@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0001-9560-7873
Amy L AhernMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Harsha KasettyNovo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, UK.
Barbara M McGowanInstitute of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helen M ParrettiNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ann VincentDepartment of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Jason C G HalfordSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the perceptions, attitudes, behaviours and potential barriers to effective obesity care in the UK using data collected from people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the Awareness, Care, and Treatment In Obesity maNagement-International Observation (ACTION-IO) study.

designUK's PwO (body mass index of ≥30 kg/m

resultsIn the UK, 1500 PwO and 306 HCPs completed the survey. Among the 47% of PwO who discussed weight with an HCP in the past 5 years, it took a mean of 9 years from the start of their struggles with weight until a discussion occurred. HCPs reported that PwO initiated 35% of weight-related discussions; PwO reported that they initiated 47% of discussions. Most PwO (85%) assumed full responsibility for their own weight loss. The presence of obesity-related comorbidities was cited by 76% of HCPs as a top criterion for initiating weight management conversations. The perception of lack of interest (72%) and motivation (61%) in losing weight was reported as top reasons by HCPs for not discussing weight with a patient. Sixty-five per cent of PwO liked their HCP bringing up weight during appointments. PwO reported complex and varied emotions following a weight loss conversation with an HCP, including supported (36%), hopeful (31%), motivated (23%) and embarrassed (17%). Follow-up appointments were scheduled for 19% of PwO after a weight discussion despite 62% wanting follow-up.

conclusionsThe current narrative around obesity requires a paradigm shift in the UK to address the delay between PwO struggling with their weight and discussing weight with their HCP. Perceptions of lack of patient interest and motivation in weight management must be challenged along with the blame culture of individual responsibility that is prevalent throughout society. While PwO may welcome weight-related conversations with an HCP, they evoke complex feelings, demonstrating the need for sensitivity and respect in these conversations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03584191.

Indexed as

Obesity ManagementDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansObesityUnited KingdomWeight Lossepidemiologygeneral medicine (see internal medicine)medical education & trainingpublic health

Identifiers

PMID34193488
PMCPMC8246368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.