Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193483›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Empowering the patient? Medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.

Stine Eidhammer Rognan, Sofia Kälvemark-Sporrong, Kajsa Rebecka Bengtsson, Helene Berg Lie, Yvonne Andersson, Morten Mowé, Liv Mathiesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. 'The way you talk, do I have a choice?' Patient narratives of medication decision-making during hospitalization.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  8. Pharmacists in general practice: what do they do? A qualitative case study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stine Eidhammer RognanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, Oslo Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway stine.eidhammer.rognan@sykehusapotekene.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-9641
Sofia Kälvemark-SporrongDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kajsa Rebecka BengtssonDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Helene Berg LieDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Yvonne AnderssonHospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South-Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Morten MowéDivision of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Liv MathiesenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffective communication and patient empowerment before hospital discharge are important steps to ensure medication safety. Patients discharged from hospitals are often expected to assume self-management, frequently without healthcare personnel (HCP) having ensured patients' knowledge, motivation and/or skills. In this substudy of a larger study, we explore how patients experience medication communication during encounters with HCPs and how they are empowered at hospital discharge.

designThis is a qualitative case study. Data collection was done through qualitative observations of patient-HCP encounters, semistructured interviews with patients and drug reconciliation. Data were analysed using content analysis.

settingAn internal medicines ward at a university hospital in Norway.

participantsNine patients aged 49-90 years were included close to the day of discharge.

resultsThe analysis revealed the following themes: (1) patient-centred care (PCC), which included 'understanding and involvement in the patient-as-person', 'establishment of a therapeutic alliance', and 'sharing power and responsibility'; and (2) biomedical (conventional) care, including the subthemes 'HCPs in power and control' and 'optimising medical outcomes, following guidelines'. Even though the elements of PCC were observed in several encounters, overall communication was not sufficiently fostering patient empowerment. Spending time with patients and building relations based on mutual trust seemed undervalued.

conclusionsThe results provide a broader understanding of how patients experience medication communication at hospital discharge. Both the patients and the HCPs appear to be inculcated with biomedical traditions and are uncertain about the roles and opportunities associated with PCC. Attention should be paid to patient preferences and to the core elements of the PCC model from admission to discharge to empower patients in medication self-management.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient DischargeHospitalsHumansNorwayPower, PsychologicalQualitative Researchinternal medicinequalitative researchsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID34193483
PMCPMC8246347
OpenAlexW3176128204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.