Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193442›Full record

Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Burden, treatment use, and outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation across the spectrum of heart failure: observational cohort study.

Philipp E Bartko, Gregor Heitzinger, Noemi Pavo, Maria Heitzinger, Georg Spinka, Suriya Prausmüller, Henrike Arfsten, Martin Andreas, Cornelia Gabler, Guido Strunk and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. When Moderate Is Severe: Bivalvular Functional Regurgitation.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Expanding the boundaries of M-TEER: is it time to treat moderate secondary mitral regurgitation?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Functional Mitral Regurgitation and the Role of Transcatheter Repair.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Journal Club].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Edge-to-Edge mitral valve repair for preoperative bridging to heart transplantation.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Beyond Medical Therapy-An Update on Heart Failure Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp E BartkoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor HeitzingerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Noemi PavoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Maria HeitzingerVienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Georg SpinkaDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Suriya PrausmüllerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Henrike ArfstenDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin AndreasDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cornelia GablerIT Systems and Communications, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Guido StrunkComplexity Research, Vienna, Austria.
Julia MascherbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian HengstenbergDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin HülsmannDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Georg GoliaschDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria georg.goliasch@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-6104
Medical University of Vienna · ATComplexity Science Hub · ATTU Wien · ATUniversitätsklinikum St. Pölten · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo define prevalence, long term outcome, and treatment standards of secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) across the heart failure spectrum.

designLarge scale cohort study.

settingObservational cohort study with data from the Viennese community healthcare provider network between 2010 and 2020, Austria.

participants13 223 patients with sMR across all heart failure subtypes.

main outcome measuresAssociation between sMR and mortality in patients assigned by guideline diagnostic criteria to one of three heart failure subtypes: reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction, was assessed.

resultsSevere sMR was diagnosed in 1317 patients (10%), correlated with increasing age (P<0.001), occurred across the entire spectrum of heart failure, and was most common in 656 (25%) of 2619 patients with reduced ejection fraction. Mortality of patients with severe sMR was higher than expected for people of the same age and sex in the same community (hazard ratio 7.53; 95% confidence interval 6.83 to 8.30, P<0.001). In comparison with patients with heart failure and no/mild sMR, mortality increased stepwise with a hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.38, P<0.001) for moderate and 1.82 (1.64 to 2.02, P<0.001) for severe sMR. The association between severe sMR and excess mortality was consistent after multivariate adjustment and across all heart failure subgroups (mid-range ejection fraction: hazard ratio 2.53 (95% confidence interval 2.00 to 3.19, P<0.001), reduced ejection fraction: 1.70 (1.43 to 2.03, P<0.001), and preserved ejection fraction: 1.52 (1.25 to 1.85, P<0.001)). Despite available state-of-the-art healthcare, high volume heart failure, and valve disease programmes, severe sMR was rarely treated by surgical valve repair (7%) or replacement (5%); low risk transcatheter repair (4%) was similarly seldom used.

conclusionSecondary mitral regurgitation is common overall, increasing with age and associated with excess mortality. The association with adverse outcome is significant across the entire heart failure spectrum but most pronounced in those with mid-range and reduced ejection fractions. Despite these poor outcomes, surgical valve repair or replacement are rarely performed; similarly, low risk transcatheter repair, specifically in the heart failure subsets with the highest expected benefit from treatment, is seldom used. The current data suggest an increasing demand for treatment, particularly in view of an expected increase in heart failure in an ageing population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustriaDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitral Valve InsufficiencyPrevalenceRegistriesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID34193442
PMCPMC8243241
OpenAlexW3174249085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.