Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193434›Full record

Trial reportBMJ supportive & palliative care2022

Randomised trial of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning.

Michelle Howard, Dawn Elston, Sayem Borhan, Abe Hafid, Neha Arora, Ruth Forbes, Carrie Bernard, Daren K Heyland

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03239639 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Control Trial of an Advance Care Planning Intervention to Engaged Substitute Decision-makers in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled61ConditionsChronic IllnessArmsAdvance care planning education session, Wait list control
NCT05024903 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized Trial of a Novel E-health Platform (Plan Well GuideTM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaren K. HeylandRan2021 to 2022Enrolled31ConditionsAging Well, Decision Making, Illness, CriticalArmsSerious illness medical planning plus the novel e-health platform (PWG 2.0), Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cultural adaptation of a community-based advance serious illness planning decision aid to the Quebec context involving end-users.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle HowardDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada mhoward@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8127-5492
Dawn ElstonDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sayem BorhanHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Abe HafidDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neha AroraDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ruth ForbesSchool of Nursing, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Carrie BernardDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Daren K HeylandDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University Faculty of Health Sciences, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-4616
McMaster University · CAImpact · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) in increasing the engagement of substitute decision-makers (SDM) in advance care planning (ACP).

methodsThis trial was conducted (2017-2019) in outpatient settings in Ontario, Canada, aiming to recruit 90 dyads of patients aged 65 years and older at high risk of needing future medical decisions and their SDM. Participants were randomised to receive the intervention immediately or to a 3-month wait period. The Plan Well Guide was administered to the patient and SDM by a facilitator. Outcomes were change on the validated 17-item SDM ACP Engagement Survey (primary) and 15-item patient ACP Engagement Survey (secondary).

resultsOf 136 dyads approached, 58 consented and were randomised and 45 completed the study (28 immediate intervention, 17 delayed intervention). The trial was stopped early because of difficulties with enrolling and following up participants. The mean changes on the SDM ACP Engagement Survey and the patient ACP Engagement Survey favoured the first group but were not statistically significant (mean difference (MD)=+0.2 (95% CI: -0.3 to 0.6) and MD=+0.4 (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.8), respectively). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis, significant treatment effects were seen in SDMs with a lower-than-median baseline score compared with those at or above the median.

conclusionsIn this statistically underpowered randomised trial, differences in SDM ACP engagement between groups were small. Further information is needed to overcome recruitment challenges and to identify people most likely to benefit from the Plan Well Guide.Trial registration number NCT03239639.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgedDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesHumansOntarioPatient Participationclinical decisionscommunicationend of life careterminal care

Identifiers

PMID34193434
PMCPMC8862020
OpenAlexW3174617194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.