ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2021
Cognitive Impairment in Older Incarcerated Males: Education and Race Considerations.
Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of cognitive screening tools in detecting possible dementia among older males in custody in Canada: a pilot study.Health & justice · 2026Article
- The care experience of people with diagnosed or suspected dementia living in prison: A case study approach.Dementia (London, England) · 2026Article
- Linkages between incarceration and health for older adults.Health & justice · 2025Review
- Carceral Health Care.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Review
- Prioritizing Diversion and Decarceration of People With Dementia.AMA journal of ethics · 2023Article
- Dementia and the aging population: cognitive screening within correctional health.International journal of prisoner health · 2023Review
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Cognitive Impairment Among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of public health · 2023Article
- The Role of Incarceration as a Risk Factor for Cognitive Impairment.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022Article
- Prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment before incarceration.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Exploring why patients in heroin-assisted treatment are getting incarcerated-a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- A scoping review of research to address older women's health during and after incarceration.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAssess cognitive impairment (global cognition and executive functioning) in older incarcerated males overall, and according to education and race.
designCross-sectional
participantsThe sample included 239 racially diverse (37.7% White, 41.4% Black, 20.9% Hispanic/Other) incarcerated males age ≥50 (mean age = 56.4 ± 6.1; range 50-79 years). MEASUREMENTS: Global cognitive impairment assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - standard MoCA scoring (1-point adjustment for ≤12 years education, and score <26 indicating cognitive impairment) versus education- and race-specific cutpoints. Trail Making Test (TMT) assessed executive functioning. The relationship between race and cognitive impairment was evaluated using Chi-Square, One-Way ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD post-hoc analyses. Chi-Square was also used to evaluate the relationship between race and frequency of missed MoCA items.
resultsAverage MoCA score was 24.12 ± 3.38. Overall, 62.8% and 38.5% of participants met criteria for cognitive impairment using standard scoring and education- and race-specific cutpoints, respectively. This difference was largely attributed to the change in proportion of Blacks who met criteria for cognitive impairment after applying education- and race-specific cutpoints (62.6% versus 19.2%). Fewer White inmates were impaired (51.1% versus 36.7%) after applying demographically-adjusted norms; however, the proportion of Hispanics/Others remained largely unchanged (84% versus 80%). A considerable proportion of participants were mildly impaired on TMT-A (18.2% Whites, 7.1% Blacks) and TMT-B (20.5% Whites, 4.1% Blacks). Race differences were observed in missed MoCA items.
conclusionsCognitive impairment is common in older incarcerated persons, despite applying education- and race-specific norms. Notable race differences highlight need for validated assessments for this diverse population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.