Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193282›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2021

Can preoperative liver MRI with gadoxetic acid help reduce open-close laparotomies for curative intent pancreatic cancer surgery?

Kartik S Jhaveri, Ali Babaei Jandaghi, Seng Thipphavong, Osvaldo Espin-Garcia, Anna Dodd, Shawn Hutchinson, Trevor W Reichman, Carol-Anne Moulton, Ian D McGilvary, Steven Gallinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Pancreatic cancer, radiomics and artificial intelligence.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kartik S JhaveriJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, 3-957, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. kartik.jhaveri@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0321
Ali Babaei JandaghiJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X6, Canada.
Seng ThipphavongJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, 3-957, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Osvaldo Espin-GarciaDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada.
Anna DoddWallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada.
Shawn HutchinsonWallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada.
Trevor W ReichmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto; Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Carol-Anne MoultonDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto; Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Ian D McGilvaryDepartment of Surgery, Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
Steven GallingerDepartment of Surgery, Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
University Health Network · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI (EOB-MRI) versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for preoperative detection of liver metastasis (LM) and reduction of open-close laparotomies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

methodsSixty-six patients with PDAC had undergone preoperative EOB-MRI and CECT. LM detection by EOB-MRI and CECT and their impact on surgical planning, open-close laparotomies were compared by clinical and radiology reports and retrospective analysis of imaging by two blinded independent readers. Histopathology or imaging follow-up was the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed at patient and lesion levels with two-sided McNemar tests.

resultsEOB-MRI showed higher sensitivity versus CECT (71.7% [62.1-80.0] vs. 34% [25.0-43.8]; p = 0.009), comparable specificity (98.6%, [96.9-99.5] vs. 100%, [99.1-100], and higher AUROC (85.1%, [80.4-89.9] vs. 66.9%, [60.9-73.1]) for LM detection. An incremental 7.6% of patients were excluded from surgery with a potential reduction of up to 13.6% in futile open-close laparotomies due to LM detected on EOB-MRI only.

conclusionsPreoperative EOB-MRI has superior diagnostic performance in detecting LM from PDAC. This better informs surgical eligibility with potential reduction of futile open-close laparotomies from attempted curative intent pancreatic cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Gadolinium DTPAAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLaparotomyLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPACT scanGadoxetic acid-enhanced MRILiver metastasisPancreatic adenocarcinomaWhipple procedure

Identifiers

PMID34193282
PMCPMC8243548
OpenAlexW3174941711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.