Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193240›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2021

COVID-19 lockdown disrupts support networks integral to maintaining foot health: a mixed-methods study.

Lindsey Cherry, Lucy Gates, David Culliford, Karen Walker-Bone, Mari Carmen Portillo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsey CherrySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. l.cherry@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-1004
Lucy GatesSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
David CullifordSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Karen Walker-BoneMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Mari Carmen PortilloSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
University of Southampton · GBArthritis UK · GBSolent NHS Trust · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15015Medical Research Council MC_PC_21002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, populations were advised to remain at home to control viral spread. Government-mandated restrictions on free movement affected individuals' engagement with physical activity, with reported increases leading to biopsychosocial health benefits and conversely increased sedentary behaviour leading to poorer health. Good foot health is key to enabling physical activity and maximal participation in activities of occupation and daily living.

methodsA population-based cross-sectional study was performed, using a web-based platform. Quantitative and qualitative data were captured through responses to closed and open survey questions. Anybody with a foot health condition was eligible to participate in the online survey. Links were sent through professional networks, support groups and charities, using a snowball strategy to maximise participation.

resultsTwo hundred fifty-five respondents completed the survey. Most (n = 193, 75.69%) reported an ongoing foot pain or problem that had been present for 4 weeks or longer, whilst 49 respondents (19.22%) noted a new pain or problem. Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (n = 139, 54.51%), whilst change in appearance of the foot was also commonly reported (n = 122, 47.84%), often alongside the observable presence of swelling. Musculoskeletal foot symptoms were frequently reported (n = 123, 48%), and were significantly associated with reported reduced physical activity (X

conclusionsPain was the most frequently reported foot problem during COVID-19 lockdown restriction. Lockdown restrictions disrupted support networks integral to maintaining foot health. Poor foot health impacted people's ability to remain physically active. Complaints previously considered relatively 'minor' such as support for skin and nail care, were found to be exacerbated by restricted support networks, leading to greater negative impact.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEvaluation Studies as TopicExerciseFemaleFootGovernment RegulationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainPatient ParticipationCOVID-19ExerciseFoot heathInfectionMixed methodsPainPhysical activitySelf-careSelf-managementSupportSurveyUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID34193240
PMCPMC8243073
OpenAlexW3153633443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.