Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193159›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2021

PIM kinases inhibit AMPK activation and promote tumorigenicity by phosphorylating LKB1.

Kwan Long Mung, William B Eccleshall, Niina M Santio, Adolfo Rivero-Müller, Päivi J Koskinen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. UM171 suppresses breast cancer progression by inducing KLF2.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024
    Article
  4. LKB1 biology: assessing the therapeutic relevancy of LKB1 inhibitors.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kwan Long MungDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20500, Turku, Finland.
William B EccleshallDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Niina M SantioDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Adolfo Rivero-MüllerDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Päivi J KoskinenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20500, Turku, Finland. paivi.koskinen@utu.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-6864-4457
University of Turku · FIÅbo Akademi University · FIMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

Academy of Finland 287040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe oncogenic PIM kinases and the tumor-suppressive LKB1 kinase have both been implicated in the regulation of cell growth and metabolism, albeit in opposite directions. Here we investigated whether these kinases interact with each other to influence AMPK activation and tumorigenic growth of prostate and breast cancer cells.

methodsWe first determined how PIM and LKB1 kinases affect AMPK phosphorylation levels. We then used in vitro kinase assays to demonstrate that LKB1 is phosphorylated by PIM kinases, and site-directed mutagenesis to identify the PIM target sites in LKB1. The cellular functions of PIM and LKB1 kinases were evaluated using either pan-PIM inhibitors or CRISPR/Cas9 genomic editing, with which all three PIM family members and/or LKB1 were knocked out from PC3 prostate and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines. In addition to cell proliferation assays, we examined the effects of PIM and/or LKB1 loss on tumor growth using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) xenograft model.

resultsWe provide both genetic and pharmacological evidence to demonstrate that inhibition of PIM expression or activity increases phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172 in both PC3 and MCF7 cells, but not in their derivatives lacking LKB1. This is explained by our observation that all three PIM family kinases can phosphorylate LKB1 at Ser334. Wild-type LKB1, but not its phosphodeficient derivative, can restore PIM inhibitor-induced AMPK phosphorylation in LKB1 knock-out cells. In the CAM model, loss of LKB1 enhances tumorigenicity of PC3 xenografts, while cells lacking both LKB1 and PIMs exhibit slower proliferation rates and form smaller tumors.

conclusionPIM kinases are novel negative regulators of LKB1 that affect AMPK activity in an LKB1-dependent fashion. The impairment of cell proliferation and tumor growth in cells lacking both LKB1 and PIMs indicates that these kinases possess a shared signaling role in the context of cancer. These data also suggest that PIM inhibitors may be a rational therapeutic option for LKB1-deficient tumors. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAMP-Activated Protein KinasesCarcinogenesisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationEnzyme ActivationHumansPhosphorylationProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1Substrate SpecificityAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAMP-Activated Protein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1proto-oncogene proteins pimSTK11 protein, humanAMPKBreast cancerCAM modelLKB1PhosphorylationPIM kinasesProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID34193159
PMCPMC8247201
OpenAlexW3173923918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.