Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193134›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Professionals' views on working in the field of domestic violence and abuse during the first wave of COVID-19: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.

Nicole E van Gelder, Ditte L van Haalen, Kyra Ekker, Suzanne A Ligthart, Sabine Oertelt-Prigione

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E van GelderGender Unit, Department of Primary and Transmural Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen, Netherlands. nicole.vangelder@radboudumc.nl.
Ditte L van HaalenGender Unit, Department of Primary and Transmural Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Kyra EkkerGender Unit, Department of Primary and Transmural Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Suzanne A LigthartGender Unit, Department of Primary and Transmural Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Sabine Oertelt-PrigioneGender Unit, Department of Primary and Transmural Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown evoked great worries among professionals in the field of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) as they expected a rise of the phenomenon. While many countries reported increased DVA, the Netherlands did not. To understand this discrepancy and the overall impact of the lockdown on DVA support services, we interviewed DVA professionals about their experiences with DVA during the rise of COVID-19, the impact of the lockdown on clients and working conditions, and views on eHealth and online tools.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted among 16 DVA professionals with various specializations. This data was analyzed using open thematic coding and content analysis.

resultsMost professionals did not see an increase in DVA reports but they did notice more severe violence. They experienced less opportunities to detect DVA and worried about their clients' wellbeing and the quality of (online) care. Furthermore, their working conditions rapidly changed, with working from home and online, and they expressed frustration, insecurity and loneliness. Professionals feel eHealth and online tools are not always suitable but they do see them as an opportunity to increase reach and maintain services when physical contact is not possible.

conclusionThis study suggests DVA was probably under-detected during the lockdown rather than not having increased. The Dutch system heavily relies on professionals to detect and report DVA, suggesting a need for critical evaluation of the accessibility of professional help. Professionals experienced significant challenges and should themselves be supported psychologically and in their changed work practices to maintain their ability to aid survivors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Domestic ViolenceCommunicable Disease ControlHumansNetherlandsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Child abuseCoronavirusCOVID-19Domestic violence and abuseeHealthIntimate partner violence and abuseOccupational healthOnlinePandemicWorking conditions

Identifiers

PMID34193134
PMCPMC8241882
OpenAlexW3174140479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.