Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193096›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Effect of a community-based intervention to increase participation in cervical cancer screening among Pakistani and Somali women in Norway.

Samera Azeem Qureshi, Jannicke Igland, Kathy Møen, Abdi Gele, Bernadette Kumar, Esperanza Diaz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03155581 (A Community-based Health Intervention Trial to Increase Attendance to Cervical Cancer-screening Program Among Immigrants in Norway.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03155581 nacompletednot on this map

A Community-based Health Intervention Trial to Increase Attendance to Cervical Cancer-screening Program Among Immigrants in Norway.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2016 to 2018Enrolled230ConditionsCervical CancerArmsUser intervention, Health professional intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samera Azeem QureshiUnit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway. samera.qureshi@fhi.no.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-733X
Jannicke IglandDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway.
Kathy MøenThe Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE) Alrek Helseklynge, Årstadveien 17, 5009, Bergen, Norway.
Abdi GeleUnit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Bernadette KumarUnit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Esperanza DiazUnit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNorway implemented a regular cervical cancer screening program based on triennial screening in 1995, recommending participation of all women between 25 and 69 years of age. Somali and Pakistani women have the lowest participation in cervical cancer screening in Norway. This study evaluates the effect of a community-based intervention aimed at increasing participation in the screening program among women from these two groups.

methodsThe intervention consisted of an oral 20-25 min presentation in Urdu and Somali on cervical cancer and screening and practical information on how to make an appointment and payment for the test. The participants were invited to pose questions related to the topic after the presentation. This study was carried out in four geographical areas surrounding the capital Oslo between February and October 2017, among women aged 25-69 years from Pakistan and Somalia. We recruited women in the intervention group directly from different community institutions, households, and religious sites. Women from Pakistan and Somalia residing in Oslo were the controls. The absolute intervention effect was measured as difference in absolute proportion of women screened and estimated as the interaction between time and group allocation in a generalized estimation equation model with binomial distribution and identity link function.

resultsThe percentage of women screened in the intervention group increased, from 46 to 51%. The corresponding increase in proportion in the control group was from 44 to 45.5%. After adjustment for potential confounders the intervention group showed a significant larger increase in participation in the screening program as compared to the control group with an absolute difference in change in proportion screened of 0.03 (95% CI; 0.02- 0.06).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that theory-based, culturally and linguistically sensitive educational interventions can raise awareness and motivate immigrant women to participate in cervical cancer screening program. In addition, approaching health professionals as well as immigrant women, might improve participation even more.

trial registrationNCT03155581 . Retrospectively registered, on 16 May 2017.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansNorwayPakistanSomaliaCervical CancerCommunity-basedEvaluationImmigrantsScreening

Identifiers

PMID34193096
PMCPMC8243573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.