Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34193033›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Integrative analysis of histomorphology, transcriptome and whole genome resequencing identified DIO2 gene as a crucial gene for the protuberant knob located on forehead in geese.

Yan Deng, Shenqiang Hu, Chenglong Luo, Qingyuan Ouyang, Li Li, Jiaming Ma, Zhenping Lin, Junpeng Chen, Hehe Liu, Jiwei Hu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yan Deng *Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Shenqiang Hu *Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Chenglong Luo *The Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong, 510640, Guangzhou, China.
Qingyuan OuyangFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Li LiFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Jiaming MaFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Zhenping LinThe Baisha Livestock and Poultry Original Species Research Institute, Guangdong, 515000, Shantou, China.
Junpeng ChenThe Baisha Livestock and Poultry Original Species Research Institute, Guangdong, 515000, Shantou, China.
Hehe LiuFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Jiwei HuFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Guohong ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic, Breeding and Molecular Design, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu, 225009, Yangzhou, China.
Dingming ShuThe Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong, 510640, Guangzhou, China.
Yuxuan PanThe Baisha Livestock and Poultry Original Species Research Institute, Guangdong, 515000, Shantou, China.
Bo HuFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Hua HeFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China.
Hao QuThe Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong, 510640, Guangzhou, China. qhw03@163.com.
Jiwen WangFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, 611130, Chengdu, China. wjw2886166@163.com.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNPoultry Research Institute · CNYangzhou University · CN

Funding

Agriculture Research System of China CARS-42-4Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2020B020222003Key Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province 2016NYZ0044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring domestication, remarkable changes in behavior, morphology, physiology and production performance have taken place in farm animals. As one of the most economically important poultry, goose owns a unique appearance characteristic called knob, which is located at the base of the upper bill. However, neither the histomorphology nor the genetic mechanism of the knob phenotype has been revealed in geese.

resultsIn the present study, integrated radiographic, histological, transcriptomic and genomic analyses revealed the histomorphological characteristics and genetic mechanism of goose knob. The knob skin was developed, and radiographic results demonstrated that the knob bone was obviously protuberant and pneumatized. Histologically, there were major differences in structures in both the knob skin and bone between geese owing knob (namely knob-geese) and those devoid of knob (namely non-knob geese). Through transcriptome analysis, 592 and 952 genes differentially expressed in knob skin and bone, and significantly enriched in PPAR and Calcium pathways in knob skin and bone, respectively, which revealed the molecular mechanisms of histomorphological differences of the knob between knob- and non-knob geese. Furthermore, integrated transcriptomic and genomic analysis contributed to the identification of 17 and 21 candidate genes associated with the knob formation in the skin and bone, respectively. Of them, DIO2 gene could play a pivotal role in determining the knob phenotype in geese. Because a non-synonymous mutation (c.642,923 G > A, P265L) changed DIO2 protein secondary structure in knob geese, and Sanger sequencing further showed that the AA genotype was identified in the population of knob geese, and was prevalent in a crossing population which was artificially selected for 10 generations.

conclusionsThis study was the first to uncover the knob histomorphological characteristics and genetic mechanism in geese, and DIO2 was identified as the crucial gene associated with the knob phenotype. These data not only expand and enrich our knowledge on the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of head appendages in both mammalian and avian species, but also have important theoretical and practical significance for goose breeding.

Indexed as

GeeseTranscriptomeAnimalsForeheadGene Expression ProfilingGenomeCranial appendageDIO2Genetic mechanismGooseHistomorphologyKnob

Identifiers

PMID34193033
PMCPMC8244220
OpenAlexW3175332444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.