Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192893›Full record

ArticleStroke2021

Long-Term Incidence of Stroke and Dementia in ASCOT.

William N Whiteley, Ajay K Gupta, Thomas Godec, Somayeh Rostamian, Andrew Whitehouse, Judy Mackay, Peter S Sever

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microvascular changes that stagger the mind.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

William N WhiteleyCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh (W.N.W.).ORCID 0000-0002-4816-8991
Ajay K GuptaWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London (A.K.G.).ORCID 0000-0001-5807-8503
Thomas GodecLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London (T.G.).ORCID 0000-0001-8119-1352
Somayeh RostamianNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London (A.G., S.R., A.W., J.M., P.S.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-7584-9493
Andrew WhitehouseNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London (A.G., S.R., A.W., J.M., P.S.S.).
Judy MackayNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London (A.G., S.R., A.W., J.M., P.S.S.).
Peter S SeverNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London (A.G., S.R., A.W., J.M., P.S.S.).
Lung Institute · USNuffield Health · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16896Chief Scientist Office SCAF/17/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Management of stroke risk factors might reduce later dementia. In ASCOT (Anglo-Scandinavian Outcome Trial), we determined whether dementia or stroke were associated with different blood pressure (BP)–lowering regimens; atorvastatin or placebo; and mean BP, BP variability, and mean cholesterol levels. Methods: Participants with hypertension and ≥3 cardiovascular disease risk factors were randomly allocated to amlodipine- or atenolol-based BP-lowering regimen targeting BP <140/90 mm Hg for 5.5 years. Participants with total cholesterol ≤6.5 mmol/L were also randomly allocated to atorvastatin 10 mg or placebo for 3.3 years. Mean and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, BP, and SD of BP were calculated from 6 months to end of trial. UK participants were linked to electronic health records to ascertain deaths and hospitalization in general and mental health hospitals. Dementia and stroke were ascertained by validated code lists and within-trial ascertainment. Results: Of 8580 UK participants, 7300 were followed up to 21 years from randomization. Atorvastatin for 3.3 years had no measurable effect on stroke (264 versus 272; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.78–1.09]; P=0.341) or dementia (238 versus 227; adjusted HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.82–1.18]; P=0.837) compared with placebo. Mean total cholesterol was not associated with later stroke or dementia. An amlodipine-based compared with an atenolol-based regimen for 5.5 years reduced stroke (443 versus 522; adjusted HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72–0.93]; P=0.003) but not dementia (450 versus 465; adjusted HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.82–1.07]; P=0.334) over follow-up. BP variability (SD mean BP) was associated with a higher risk of dementia (per 5 mm Hg HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06–1.24]; P<0.001) and stroke (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.12–1.32]; P<0.001) adjusted for mean BP. Conclusions: An amlodipine-based BP regimen reduced the long-term incidence of stroke compared with an atenolol-based regimen but had no measurable effect on dementia. Atorvastatin had no effect on either stroke or dementia. Higher BP variability was associated with a higher incidence of later dementia and stroke.

Indexed as

AgedAmlodipineAnticholesteremic AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsAtenololAtorvastatinCholesterolDementiaFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsScandinavian and Nordic CountriesAmlodipineAnticholesteremic AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsAtenololAtorvastatinCholesterolblood pressurecholesteroldementiarisk factorsstroke

Identifiers

PMID34192893
PMCPMC8478091
OpenAlexW3177069359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.