Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192740›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Methodological Aspects of Diet Quality Indicators in Childhood: A Mapping Review.

Ángela Hernández-Ruiz, Liza Alejandra Díaz-Jereda, Casandra Madrigal, María José Soto-Méndez, Anneleen Kuijsten, Ángel Gil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between Diet Quality and Health Outcomes among Children in Rural Areas of Northwest China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ángela Hernández-RuizIberoamerican Nutrition Foundation (FINUT), Granada, Spain.
Liza Alejandra Díaz-JeredaDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Casandra MadrigalIberoamerican Nutrition Foundation (FINUT), Granada, Spain.
María José Soto-MéndezIberoamerican Nutrition Foundation (FINUT), Granada, Spain.
Anneleen KuijstenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ángel GilIberoamerican Nutrition Foundation (FINUT), Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7663-0939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet quality indicators (DQIns) are tools that aim to assess an individual's overall diet quality. Previous reviews focused mainly on health-related outcomes but did not provide detailed information about components, assessment variables, or important methodological issues for the development and application of DQIns in the pediatric age. The current mapping review aims to provide comprehensive guidance regarding DQIns developed through a priori methodology in children aged ≤14 y that have been applied worldwide. A mapping review was conducted, whereby 1665 original articles describing the development, modifications, and updates of DQIns, published up to June 26, 2020, in English and Spanish, were retrieved. A total of 139 articles were identified and classified into 13 subgroups. There were 10 overall DQIns: Healthy Eating Indexes (n = 25), Dietary Diversity Scores (n = 20), Diet Quality Indexes (n = 16), Food Variety Scores (n = 11), Healthy and Unhealthy Scores (n = 11), Feeding and Eating Indexes (n = 10), Diet Quality Scores (n = 5), Nutritional Adequacy and Micronutrients Indexes (n = 5), Dietary Guidelines Indexes (n = 5), and Other Healthy Diet Indexes (n = 13). Three additional subgroups of dietary and lifestyle indicators found were Mediterranean Diet Indexes (n = 10), Diet-Lifestyle Indexes (n = 5), and Breakfast Quality Indexes (n = 3). This compilation of DQIns will help researchers select the most appropriate tool for future epidemiological studies by considering a careful selection of information about the assessment components, scoring methods, and key methodological issues. The main limitations of this review are that, due to its nature, a risk-of-bias assessment was not performed and the article screening was completed in 2 databases (PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus). More research is needed to identify health-related outcomes associated with DQIns in the pediatric population, using clearer and more standardized methodological criteria.

Indexed as

Diet, MediterraneanQuality Indicators, Health CareChildDietDiet, HealthyDiet SurveysEatingHumansadolescentchilddietary assessmentdietary indicatorsdiet indexdiet qualityindex specificationmapping reviewmethodological criteriapediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34192740
PMCPMC8634546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.