Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192577›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2022

Endotheliopathy marked by high von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen in COVID-19 is associated with poor outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arief Wibowo, Raymond Pranata, Michael Anthonius Lim, Mohammad Rizki Akbara, Januar Wibawa Martha

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Treatment of ARDS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arief WibowoDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Hasan Sadikin, Bandung, Indonesia. Electronic address: ariefwibowo.doc@gmail.com.
Raymond PranataDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Hasan Sadikin, Bandung, Indonesia; Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Michael Anthonius LimFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Mohammad Rizki AkbaraDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Hasan Sadikin, Bandung, Indonesia.
Januar Wibawa MarthaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Hasan Sadikin, Bandung, Indonesia.
Padjadjaran University · IDPelita Harapan University · IDDr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the levels of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) antigen in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a poor outcome compared with those with a good outcome, and explored factors that may affect the difference in terms of vWF antigen between the two groups.

methodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases was undertaken from inception until 7 April 2021. The primary outcome was poor outcome, which is a composite of mortality and severity of COVID-19.

resultsTen studies including a total of 996 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. vWF antigen was higher in patients with poor outcomes [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.84 [0.45-1.23], P<0.001; I

conclusionThis meta-analysis showed that the level of vWF antigen was significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 with a poor outcome, signalling marked endotheliopathy. Meta-regression showed that the differences became larger as the platelet count, d-dimer level and factor VIII level increased.

Indexed as

COVID-19von Willebrand FactorHumansvon Willebrand FactorCoagulopathyCoronavirusEndothelial dysfunctionMortalityThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID34192577
PMCPMC8236128
OpenAlexW3174657360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.