Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192490›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2021

Assessing the performance and learning curve of orthopaedic surgical trainees in primary total hip arthroplasty.

R A McCulloch, D Howgate, V N Gibbs, Ajr Palmer, A H Taylor, Bjl Kendrick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fluoroscopic image-based behavior analysis can objectively explain subjective expert assessment of wire navigation skill.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R A McCullochNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
D HowgateNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
V N GibbsBotnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK.
Ajr PalmerBotnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK.
A H TaylorNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Bjl KendrickNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aims of this study were threefold: first, to review the surgical performance of trainees in our departments by reviewing postoperative radiographs and operative times; second, to investigate the effect of supervision and assistant grade on postoperative radiographs and operative times; and third, to monitor trainees over a 6-month period looking for changes in postoperative radiograph appearances and operative times to assess whether these parameters reflect a trainee's learning curve.

methodsA retrospective evaluation of a continuous series of primary hip arthroplasty procedures performed by 12 trainee orthopaedic surgeons (StR) during their arthroplasty rotation. In total, 348 primary total hip replacement (pTHR) operations were performed by StRs. Operative time, acetabular cup inclination, radiological leg length discrepancy (rLLD), femoral stem alignment (FSA) and the Barrack score for cementation were evaluated. The mean number of pTHRs performed per 6-month placement was 29 (range 15-51). Operative times were available for 292 cases and all postoperative imaging was evaluated.

resultsThe mean operative time for StRs as first-surgeon was 84.3 minutes (range 42-174 minutes). Significant differences in operative times were observed between individual StRs. As a cohort, the operative times were not affected by the level of supervision but were significantly slower when StRs were assisted by other StRs. Significant differences in rLLD, FSA and Barrack score for cementation were observed across the cohort of StRs, although this did not change at a group or individual level between the first and second halves of the 6-month placement.

conclusionsUsed in isolation, postoperative radiographs and operative time are not an effective measure of the learning curve in primary hip arthroplasty, however, they may be a useful adjunct in assessing the performance of orthopaedic trainees when learning primary hip arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Learning CurveArthroplasty, Replacement, HipClinical CompetenceHip JointHumansInternship and ResidencyOperative TimeOrthopedic SurgeonsOsteoarthritis, HipPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLearning curveOperative timePrimary hip arthroplastyRadiographs

Identifiers

PMID34192490
PMCPMC10335095
OpenAlexW3175042603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.