Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192199›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2021

Staff-pupil SARS-CoV-2 infection pathways in schools in Wales: a population-level linked data approach.

Daniel A Thompson, Hoda Abbasizanjani, Richard Fry, Emily Marchant, Lucy Griffiths, Ashley Akbari, Joe Hollinghurst, Laura North, Jane Lyons, Fatemeh Torabi and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemicThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel A ThompsonSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Hoda AbbasizanjaniSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9575-4758
Richard FrySwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7968-6679
Emily MarchantSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Lucy GriffithsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ashley AkbariSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Joe HollinghurstSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Laura NorthSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jane LyonsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Fatemeh TorabiSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Gareth DaviesSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Mike B GravenorSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ronan A LyonsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Swansea University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V028367/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Better understanding of the role that children and school staff play in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is essential to guide policy development on controlling infection while minimising disruption to children's education and well-being. Methods: Our national e-cohort (n=464531) study used anonymised linked data for pupils, staff and associated households linked via educational settings in Wales. We estimated the odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection for staff and pupils over the period August- December 2020, dependent on measures of recent exposure to known cases linked to their educational settings. Results: The total number of cases in a school was not associated with a subsequent increase in the odds of testing positive (staff OR per case: 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00; pupil OR per case: 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.02). Among pupils, the number of recent cases within the same year group was significantly associated with subsequent increased odds of testing positive (OR per case: 1.12, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.15). These effects were adjusted for a range of demographic covariates, and in particular any known cases within the same household, which had the strongest association with testing positive (staff OR: 39.86, 95% CI 35.01 to 45.38; pupil OR: 9.39, 95% CI 8.94 to 9.88). Conclusions: In a national school cohort, the odds of staff testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were not significantly increased in the 14-day period after case detection in the school. However, pupils were found to be at increased odds, following cases appearing within their own year group, where most of their contacts occur. Strong mitigation measures over the whole of the study period may have reduced wider spread within the school environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildHumansSARS-CoV-2SchoolsSemantic WebWalesdisease transmissionpublic healthSARS-CoV-2schools

Identifiers

PMID34192199
PMCPMC8111870
OpenAlexW3165292633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.