ReviewBMJ open ophthalmology2021
Treatment choices for diabetic macular oedema: a guideline for when to consider an intravitreal corticosteroid, including adaptations for the COVID-19 era.
Review in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes for patients treated for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2022Pooled it
- Modified Delphi expert consensus on the optimal intravitreal treatment pathway for centre involving diabetic macular oedema patients within the National Health Service.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Infographic: impact of baseline visual acuity, time-in-range and early treatment on functional outcomes in DMO: insights from the IRISS outcomes.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Nonadherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema : The names of the authors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- New targets in diabetic retinopathy: addressing limitations of current treatments through the Sema3A/Nrp1 pathway.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- What have we learned from a decade treating patients with diabetic macular oedema with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant?Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Visual and anatomical failure of anti-VEGF therapy for retinal vascular diseases: a survival analysis of real-world data.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Suboptimal outcomes and treatment burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema in phakic patients.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Combined Treatment of Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept and Triamcinolone Acetonide in Pseudophakic Eyes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Non-Responsive to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Ontario, Canada.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Macular Edema and Uveitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- IL-17A Damages the Blood-Retinal Barrier through Activating the Janus Kinase 1 Pathway.Biomedicines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First-line treatment of centrally involved diabetic macular oedema (CI-DMO) is often with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent. Although this can provide efficacy in the majority of eyes, a sizeable proportion do not respond sufficiently and many continue to receive anti-VEGF therapy after it may be optimal. This imposes a treatment burden on both patients and clinicians and, most importantly of all, can be sight threatening. Changing treatment to an intravitreal corticosteroid implant at the appropriate time may help optimise patient outcomes and reduce injection frequency, thereby reducing treatment burden. Eight retina specialists convened to discuss how to ensure eyes with CI-DMO receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy are evaluated for a potential change to intravitreal corticosteroid therapy at the most effective time in their treatment journey. They concluded that clear criteria on when to consider changing treatment would be helpful and so developed a consensus guideline covering key decision points such as when and how to assess response to anti-VEGF therapy, when to consider a change to corticosteroid therapy and when and how to assess the response to corticosteroid therapy. The guideline was developed before the COVID-19 pandemic but, with the additional challenges arising from this including even greater pressure on clinic capacity, it is more important than ever to reconsider current working practices and adopt changes to improve patient care while also easing pressure on clinic capacity, reducing hospital visits and maintaining patient safety. This publication therefore also includes suggestions for adapting the guidelines in the COVID-19 era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.