Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192155›Full record

ReviewBMJ open ophthalmology2021

Treatment choices for diabetic macular oedema: a guideline for when to consider an intravitreal corticosteroid, including adaptations for the COVID-19 era.

Louise Downey, Nachiketa Acharya, Helen Devonport, Richard Gale, Maged Habib, Vina Manjunath, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Philip Severn

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nonadherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema : The names of the authors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Louise DowneyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK Louise.downey@hey.nhs.uk.
Nachiketa AcharyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Helen DevonportDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Richard GaleDepartment of Ophthalmology, York Hospital, York, UK.
Maged HabibDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UK.
Vina ManjunathDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rajarshi MukherjeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Philip SevernDepartment of Ophthalmology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Bradford Royal Infirmary · GBHull Royal Infirmary · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBSunderland Eye Infirmary · GBYork Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First-line treatment of centrally involved diabetic macular oedema (CI-DMO) is often with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent. Although this can provide efficacy in the majority of eyes, a sizeable proportion do not respond sufficiently and many continue to receive anti-VEGF therapy after it may be optimal. This imposes a treatment burden on both patients and clinicians and, most importantly of all, can be sight threatening. Changing treatment to an intravitreal corticosteroid implant at the appropriate time may help optimise patient outcomes and reduce injection frequency, thereby reducing treatment burden. Eight retina specialists convened to discuss how to ensure eyes with CI-DMO receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy are evaluated for a potential change to intravitreal corticosteroid therapy at the most effective time in their treatment journey. They concluded that clear criteria on when to consider changing treatment would be helpful and so developed a consensus guideline covering key decision points such as when and how to assess response to anti-VEGF therapy, when to consider a change to corticosteroid therapy and when and how to assess the response to corticosteroid therapy. The guideline was developed before the COVID-19 pandemic but, with the additional challenges arising from this including even greater pressure on clinic capacity, it is more important than ever to reconsider current working practices and adopt changes to improve patient care while also easing pressure on clinic capacity, reducing hospital visits and maintaining patient safety. This publication therefore also includes suggestions for adapting the guidelines in the COVID-19 era.

Indexed as

COVID-19drugsinflammationintraocular pressuremacularetinatreatment medicalvision

Identifiers

PMID34192155
PMCPMC8088120
OpenAlexW3159392239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.