Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192097›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2019

A Smartphone Magnetometer-Based Diagnostic Test for Automatic Contact Tracing in Infectious Disease Epidemics.

Seungyeon Jeong, Seungho Kuk, Hyogon Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Internet of Things Based Contact Tracing Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IoT Platform for COVID-19 Prevention and Control: A Survey.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seungyeon JeongDepartment of Computer Science and EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoul02841South Korea.
Seungho KukDepartment of Computer Science and EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoul02841South Korea.
Hyogon KimDepartment of Computer Science and EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoul02841South Korea.
Namseoul University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone magnetometer readings exhibit high linear correlation when two phones coexist within a short distance. Thus, the detected coexistence can serve as a proxy for close human contact events, and one can conceive using it as a possible automatic tool to modernize the contact tracing in infectious disease epidemics. This paper investigates how good a diagnostic test it would be, by evaluating the discriminative and predictive power of the smartphone magnetometer-based contact detection in multiple measures. Based on the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios, we find that the decision made by the smartphone magnetometer-based test can be accurate in telling contacts from no contacts. Furthermore, through the evaluation process, we determine the appropriate range of compared trace segment sizes and the correlation cutoff values that we should use in such diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

diagnostic testhuman contact tracinginfectious disease epidemicMobile sensingsmartphone magnetometer

Identifiers

PMID34192097
PMCPMC7309220
OpenAlexW2914713467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.