Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192058›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Community engagement during COVID: A field report from seven CTSAs.

Erica E Marsh, Michael D Kappelman, Rhonda G Kost, Gia Mudd-Martin, Jackilen Shannon, Louisa A Stark, Olveen Carrasquillo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lessons Learned from the Lessons Learned in Public Health during the First Years of COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Erica E MarshMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1331-6525
Michael D KappelmanNorth Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NCTraCS) Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rhonda G KostThe Rockefeller University (RU) Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS), New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-0589
Gia Mudd-MartinThe University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jackilen ShannonOregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Louisa A StarkCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Olveen CarrasquilloUniversity of Miami (UM) Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USRockefeller University · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
SouthEast Enrollment Center (SEEC) OT2OD026551 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, COLON, VIVIAN · 2018 to 2023
$62.8M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
Developing, Demonstrating, and Disseminating Innovative Programs to Achieve Translational SuccessUL1TR001866 · NCATS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY, KRUEGER, JAMES G · 2016 to 2025
$40.6M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Tumor Biology Research ProgramP30CA240139 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI JONATHAN C TRENT · 2019 to 2026
$24.1M
Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002736 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2018 to 2022
$23.2M
CTSA Coordinating Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC)U24TR002260 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OSSIP, DEBORAH J, ZAND, MARTIN S · 2017 to 2021
$19.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002260NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001866NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002736NCI NIH HHS P30 CA240139NIH HHS OT2 OD026551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior to the COVID pandemic, many CTSAs employed face-to-face interactions to conduct most of their community engagement (CE) activities. During the COVID pandemic, such engagement had to be curtailed and alternatives needed to be formulated. In addition, Community Engaged Research (CEnR) teams refocused their efforts to address this public health crisis.

methodsTo obtain a general understanding of how CTSAs have conducted CE and CEnR during the COVID pandemic, we invited seven CTSA CE leaders to provide brief field reports of their activities during the pandemic. This included how their approaches to CE and CEnR were modified during the COVID-19 pandemic and key lessons learned.

resultsWe found that despite numerous challenges, all seven CTSAs CE cores were able to successfully carry out CE and CEnR. We also found that the fundamental principles of meaningful and authentic stakeholder engagement were of paramount importance during the pandemic. Through virtual approaches, all sites had considerable success in maintaining CE in during the COVID pandemic. They also leveraged existing bi-directional community partnerships to carry out meaningful and impactful research. This included both new COVID CEnR and also innovative approaches to sustain prior non-COVID research.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that academic-community partnerships must be fostered and sustained over the many years so that when such crises emerge, all partners can build on existing trust and mutual respect. The lessons learned and the new tools and approaches developed would be key in addressing any such future public health emergencies.

Indexed as

community engagementCOVIDCTSAhealth disparities

Identifiers

PMID34192058
PMCPMC8185415
OpenAlexW3159832690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.