Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34192009›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2021

Danger zone assessment in small-sided recreational football: providing data for consideration in relation to COVID-19 transmission.

Morten B Randers, Nikolas Sten Knudsen, Manuel Mounir Demetry Thomasen, Jeppe Panduro, Malte Nejst Larsen, Magni Mohr, Zoran Milanovic, Peter Krustrup, Thomas Bull Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Morten B RandersDepartment of Sports Science and Clinichal Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0192-8981
Nikolas Sten KnudsenSection for Sport Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.
Manuel Mounir Demetry ThomasenSection for Sport Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9379-4617
Jeppe PanduroDepartment of Sports Science and Clinichal Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8887-8875
Malte Nejst LarsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinichal Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-7126
Magni MohrFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1749-8533
Zoran MilanovicFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3224-0506
Peter KrustrupDepartment of Sports Science and Clinichal Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0192-8981
Thomas Bull AndersenSection for Sport Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-6896
University of Southern Denmark · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Nis · RSUniversity of the Faroe Islands · FO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, physical inactivity has increased, and a wide range of sporting activities locked down, with possible long-term implications for public health. Football is the most popular sport worldwide, and recreational football training leads to broad-spectrum health effects. Football is, however, deemed a contact sport with frequent close contact important to consider during COVID-19 pandemic.

objectivesThis study investigated time spent with close contact (danger zone (DZ) within 1.5 m), number of contacts and time per contact, and compared game formats in recreational small-sided football games for young and adult male football players.

methodsMovement analyses were performed on 10 Hz Global Positioning System (GPS) data collected during various small-sided football games prior to the COVID-19 outbreak.

resultsTime spent in the DZ was 4.3-7.9 s/h per per cent infected players, corresponding to 34.3-114.8 s/h if one player was infected. Number of contacts with one infected player was 23.5-87.7 per hour, with an average contact time of 1.1-1.4 s, and a total number of contacts of 311-691 per hour with all players. 53%-65% of all contacts were shorter than 1 s and 77%-85% shorter than 2 s. Trivial to small effects were found for number of participants and area per player, whereas standard of play and playing with/without boards had no effect.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that during small-sided football limited time is spent within DZ and that player contacts are brief. Recreational football may therefore more appropriately be deemed as sporting activity with brief, sporadic contact.

Indexed as

footballhealth promotionsoccertrainingvirus

Identifiers

PMID34192009
PMCPMC7802394
OpenAlexW3119130985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.