Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191925›Full record

ArticleApplied soft computing2021

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) detection using X-ray images and enhanced DenseNet.

Saleh Albahli, Nasir Ayub, Muhammad Shiraz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied soft computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A fuzzy fine-tuned model for COVID-19 diagnosis.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saleh AlbahliDepartment of Information Technology, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Nasir AyubDepartment of Computer Science, Federal Urdu University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShirazDepartment of Computer Science, Federal Urdu University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) originating from China, has spread rapidly among people living in other countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), by the end of January, more than 104 million people have been affected by COVID-19, including more than 2 million deaths. The number of COVID-19 test kits available in hospitals is reduced due to the increase in regular cases. Therefore, an automatic detection system should be introduced as a fast, alternative diagnostic to prevent COVID-19 from spreading among humans. For this purpose, three different BiT models: DenseNet, InceptionV3, and Inception-ResNetV4 have been proposed in this analysis for the diagnosis of patients infected with coronavirus pneumonia using X-ray radiographs in the chest. These three models give and examine Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses and uncertainty matrices, using 5-fold cross-validation. We have performed the simulations which have visualized that the pre-trained DenseNet model has the best classification efficiency with 92% among two other models proposed (83.47% accuracy for inception V3 and 85.57% accuracy for Inception-ResNetV4).

Indexed as

Biomedical imagingConvolutional neural networkCOVID-19Deep learningDenseNetResNet

Identifiers

PMID34191925
PMCPMC8225990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.