The COVID-19 Rapid and Swab Tests Takes the Lives of Pregnant Women and Their Babies: Does It Violate Human Rights?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Exercise or lie down? The impact of fitness app use on users' wellbeing.Frontiers in public health · 2023
   Article
2. Dancing during labor in the midst of COVID-19 outbreak: as an alternative non-pharmacological treatment after digital interventions.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2022
   Article
3. Indonesia is already in a state of 'Herd Stupidity': is it a slump?Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2022
   Article
4. 'Herd stupidity' as a result of 'irrational beliefs': The mental health issues in the COVID-19 outbreak.Asian journal of psychiatry · 2021
   Article
5. Expressive art therapies for treating online games addiction in COVID-19 outbreak: Why are they important?Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.