Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191859›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Functional assessment of cancer therapy questionnaire for melanoma in the Serbian population: A factor analytic approach.

Suzana Matkovic, Jelena Dotlic, Tatjana Gazibara, Gorica Maric, Vladimir Nikolic, Natasa Maksimovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suzana MatkovicInstitute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena DotlicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Tatjana GazibaraFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9621-8375
Gorica MaricFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladimir NikolicFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Natasa MaksimovicFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M) questionnaire in the Serbian language. The FACT-M was translated into Serbian using the standard methodology after obtaining the licence from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) translation project team. This version of FACT-M was distributed to a cohort of consecutive patients with histologically confirmed high-risk skin melanoma treated at the tertiary referral center. To examine construct validity of the FACT-M in Serbian, we performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The FACT-General (FACT-G) did not fit the original 4-domain structure. Instead, we accepted a 7-domain structure which, aside from physical, emotional, social and functional well-being, had domains of 'friends' support', 'illness acceptance' and 'fear of death'. Melanoma scale (MS) and Melanoma surgery scale (MSS) did not fit the original one-dimensional structure. The MS was observed to have 4 domains: 'pain', 'skin problems', 'abdominal metastases' and 'other problems'. The MSS was observed to have 2 domains: 'having symptoms' and 'no symptoms'. It is suggested that the FACT-M questionnaire is analyzed using the newly extracted domains to examine quality of life of people with high-risk melanoma in Serbia.

Indexed as

Factor Analysis, StatisticalSurveys and QuestionnairesFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSerbiaStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34191859
PMCPMC8244891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.