Observational studyPloS one2021
Absence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization among immunocompetent healthy adults: Insights from a longitudinal study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- New Antimicrobial Resistance Strategies: An Adaptive Resistance Network Conferring Reduced Glycopeptide Susceptibility in VISA.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Balancing the Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance in VISA DAP-R CA-MRSA Superbug.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has long been known as a major cause of hospital-acquired (HA-MRSA) infections worldwide. For the past twenty years, an increasing number of studies have described its emergence in the community as well. In Portugal, a country with a high-prevalence of HA-MRSA, there are only limited data available on the epidemiology of MRSA in the community. We studied the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA colonization among healthy adults in Portugal. Between February 2015 and December 2016, a longitudinal study was conducted in which 87 adults aged 25-50 years old were followed for six months. For each participant nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and saliva samples were obtained monthly and, in some cases, weekly. A total of 1,578 samples (n = 526 for each sampling site) were examined for the presence of S. aureus and MRSA by classical culture-based methods. Fifty-seven adults (65.5%) carried S. aureus at least once during the six months period of the study: 19.5% were persistent S. aureus carriers and 46.0% were intermittent carriers. Carriage rates per sampling site were 20.5% in nasopharynx, 18.3% in oropharynx, and 13.5% in saliva. Simultaneous screening of the three sampling sites increased detection of S. aureus, which overall occurred in 34.4% of the 526 sampling time-points. No MRSA were isolated. In conclusion, this study adds novel information about the MRSA scenario in the Portuguese community. Our results indicate that, in Portugal, MRSA does not seem to circulate among healthy adults without risk factors and therefore this age group does not constitute, at the current time, a reservoir of MRSA in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.