Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191803›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Haplotype network branch diversity, a new metric combining genetic and topological diversity to compare the complexity of haplotype networks.

Eric Garcia, Daniel Wright, Remy Gatins, May B Roberts, Hudson T Pinheiro, Eva Salas, Jei-Ying Chen, Jacob R Winnikoff, Giacomo Bernardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric GarciaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-3753
Daniel WrightDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Remy GatinsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
May B RobertsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Hudson T PinheiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Eva SalasDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Jei-Ying ChenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Jacob R WinnikoffDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Giacomo BernardiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8249-4678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common way of illustrating phylogeographic results is through the use of haplotype networks. While these networks help to visualize relationships between individuals, populations, and species, evolutionary studies often only quantitatively analyze genetic diversity among haplotypes and ignore other network properties. Here, we present a new metric, haplotype network branch diversity (HBd), as an easy way to quantifiably compare haplotype network complexity. Our metric builds off the logic of combining genetic and topological diversity to estimate complexity previously used by the published metric haplotype network diversity (HNd). However, unlike HNd which uses a combination of network features to produce complexity values that cannot be defined in probabilistic terms, thereby obscuring the values' implication for a sampled population, HBd uses frequencies of haplotype classes to incorporate topological information of networks, keeping the focus on the population and providing easy-to-interpret probabilistic values for randomly sampled individuals. The goal of this study is to introduce this more intuitive metric and provide an R script that allows researchers to calculate diversity and complexity indices from haplotype networks. A group of datasets, generated manually (model dataset) and based on published data (empirical dataset), were used to illustrate the behavior of HBd and both of its terms, haplotype diversity, and a new index called branch diversity. Results followed a predicted trend in both model and empirical datasets, from low metric values in simple networks to high values in complex networks. In short, the new combined metric joins genetic and topological diversity of haplotype networks, into a single complexity value. Based on our analysis, we recommend the use of HBd, as it makes direct comparisons of network complexity straightforward and provides probabilistic values that can readily discriminate situations that are difficult to resolve with available metrics.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationHaplotypesHumansModels, GeneticPhylogeography

Identifiers

PMID34191803
PMCPMC8244886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.