Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191578›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2021

Increasing the Efficiency of a National Laboratory Response to COVID-19: a Nationwide Multicenter Evaluation of 47 Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays by 41 Laboratories.

Maaike J C van den Beld, Jean-Luc Murk, Jan Kluytmans, Marion P G Koopmans, Johan Reimerink, Inge H M van Loo, Marjolijn C A Wegdam-Blans, Hans Zaaijer, Serology Workgroup for SARS-CoV-2, Corine GeurtsvanKessel and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. External quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serology in European expert laboratories, April 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Maaike J C van den BeldCentre for Infectious Disease Control, WHO COVID-19 Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environmentgrid.31147.30, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Jean-Luc MurkMicrovida, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Jan KluytmansAmphia Ziekenhuis Breda, Microvida Laboratory for Microbiology, Breda, the Netherlands.
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johan ReimerinkCentre for Infectious Disease Control, WHO COVID-19 Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environmentgrid.31147.30, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Inge H M van LooDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht UMC+ and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Marjolijn C A Wegdam-BlansDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology (PAMM), Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Hans ZaaijerSanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Serology Workgroup for SARS-CoV-2
Corine GeurtsvanKesselDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Chantal ReuskenCentre for Infectious Disease Control, WHO COVID-19 Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environmentgrid.31147.30, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLPAMM · NLSanquin · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the worldwide pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the subsequent antibody tests that flooded the market, a nationwide collaborative approach in the Netherlands was employed. Forty-one Dutch laboratories joined forces and shared their evaluation data to allow for the evaluation of a quantity of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 that exceeds the capacity of each individual laboratory. As of April 2020, these performance data had been aggregated and shared in regularly updated reports with other laboratories, Dutch government, public health organizations, and the public. This frequently updated overview of assay performance increased the efficiency of our national laboratory response, supporting laboratories in their choice and implementation of assays. Aggregated performance data for 47 immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 showed that none of the evaluated immunoassays that detect only IgM or IgA met the diagnostic criteria, indicating that they are not suitable for diagnosing acute infections. For the detection of IgG, only the Biozek Corona virus COVID rapid test, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG, and Wantai SARS-CoV-2 antibody (Ab) ELISA met predefined performance criteria in hospitalized patients where samples were collected 14 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO), while for patients with mild or asymptomatic infections, only the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA met the predefined performance criteria if samples were collected 14 days postonset. Here, we describe this unique nationwide collaboration during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic; the collected data and their results are an example of what can be accomplished when forces are joined during a public health crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 TestingHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin MLaboratoriesMulticenter Studies as TopicPandemicsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin MCOVID-19diagnosticsimmunoassayslaboratory responseSARS-CoV-2serology

Identifiers

PMID34191578
PMCPMC8373020
OpenAlexW3175597068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.